User talk:Emimama/European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Peer Review)

Group F - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development From the beginning of the work I would say that Historical context is well developed, in a clear manner and it has all the proper sources mentioned in the link, and diversity of bibliography sources makes me feel that you got the idea of neutrality. In addition, the structure is clear and comprehensive. In the Structure maybe you can develop more border context; I can understand that this is a very technical issue when it comes to structure but try to show the reader a diversity of sources. In the Board Directors section, I guess you are still working to develop a context… so, keep going. The President and Membership subchapters are well-developed and have a clear structure. I would give one piece of advice to make these technical sub-chapters shorter (as it is) and clear structure so for a reader it is comprehensive and nice to read. Other sub-chapters are very logically developed, keep a simple and clear structure, but try to give a reader more reliable sources, so the neutrality and professionalism comes on surface. Wish you good work and you are doing great! (Khatiamirziashvili (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC))