User talk:Emilyartinian

Welcome!

Hello, Emilyartinian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Lost 14:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Helpme

I went digging through your contribs for a minute -- it looks like they're all pointing at Artists' Books, which I believe was the way you wanted it, yes? I saw you removed the request, so maybe I should just let it sit, but on the other hand maybe you'd like to know just how fast helpme responses can get to be. :) Luna Santin 10:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That seems plausible -- to tell the truth, I know how to place redirects, but I've got about no idea how they work, heh. Could be the database, could maybe also be a browser cache. Hard to tell, sometimes. :) Happy editing. Luna Santin 10:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hi,Emily... I've been away on vacation. Now that I'm back, I'm thinking about the request for images in the artists' books article. I'm worried about the permissions issue with artists books. But I was just looking at your website and noticed that you have great images of your books. Would you be willing to upload them to the Commons or let me do it? I haven't actually uploaded images yet, but I'm willing to learn. I have a friend who will let me upload some of her work which could then be put in the article. Over time other artists might be willing to allow their images to be added as well. It would greatly improve the article. What do you think?Sue Maberry 04:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your email survey

Hi there, thanks for your email survey, but I have nver before been to this article. Your email prompted me to visit the article, edit a little and raise a question about defining artists' books on the article talk page. So my answers to your three questions are 1. No; 2. Yes; 3. Not as it stands.

I personally don't find the article itself engaging because it contains a long list-style roundup of centres in the States which seems to bend the article topic itself, out of shape.* As a former print artist myself, the whole charm of an artists' book as object is its 3D haptic presence, personal expression, its comparative rarity (eg, limited edition, materiality, specialised production etc), its resonance with the artist's body by implication in contrast with mass production, avoiding "mere image" (meant in a reductive way, not negatively) or other distancing technologies. It has the nuance of a succinct personalised statement implying much more. I'd like to see more exploration of history, context, concepts, how it functions in relation to digitisation, and where the artist book is going, in the article than promoting masses of artist book production centres, but that's just my POV. Best with your paper, : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(*There are almanacs and directories for this kind of thing such as galleries in localities and so on, so maybe a separate article for this purpose would be more suitable, even preferable, and just a few paragraphs on general development and overview of the movement in the article itself.)

License tagging for Image:Reimer Legendary.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reimer Legendary.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sol LeWitt Autobiography.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Sol LeWitt Autobiography.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HawrisoKilling.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:HawrisoKilling.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Reimer Legendary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Reimer Legendary.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]