User talk:EmilyTaylorDW

Welcome!

Hello, EmilyTaylorDW, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 13:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I noticed the "DW" in your username. Do you work for Daisy Wholesale? -- Dolotta (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello EmilyTaylorDW. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Daisy Wholesale, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EmilyTaylorDW. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EmilyTaylorDW|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dolotta (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 09:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Joe (talk) 10:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion. You were also advised above of our rules on paid editing: I'll ask you to either confirm that you are not connected to Daisy Wholesale or clearly disclose the conflict of interest before considering an unblock request. – Joe (talk) 10:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

EmilyTaylorDW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24007 was submitted on Feb 20, 2019 12:31:58. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EmilyTaylorDW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just updating inaccurate details on the Daisy Wholesale page, not using it for promotional purposes.

Decline reason:

I have verified you have indeed been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. You won't be unblocked to edit Daisy Wholesale. If you wish to write about other subject areas, areas for which you do not have a conflict of interest, please tell us what they are and convince us you'll abide by the policies I have linked to. Yamla (talk) 14:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that the user evaded this block using MeanAsJam SmartSE (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]