User talk:EmilyChen0

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Plastic surgery have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Plastic surgery was changed by EmilyChen0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872344 on 2021-03-24T18:57:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Billhpike. I noticed that you recently removed content from Luke Brugnara without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Luke Brugnara. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 22:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Luke Brugnara page, there are slanderous errors on Luke Brugnara wilipage including stating he is in prison when he has been released for six months (see BOP.gov webpage inmate locator ,-released Nov 2020) and no other businessperson in prison has that mentioned in the opening wikiparagraph! (Martha Stewart) User BubbaJoe123456 is not accurate information back on the Luke Brugnara page. EmilyChen0 (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is a discussion about this account at WP:ANI. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 22:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Joshualeverburg1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshualeverburg1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Oshwah I’m offended as your criticism I am not a sockpuppet of User:Joshualeverburg1 I do NOT KNOW who this person is! I’m an Chinese American, living in the Bay Area. Your action for blocked me thinking that I’m the sockpuppet without any evidence! I never been disrespected and being called as a sockpuppet in my whole life. You need to investigate this! I’m DO NOT KNOW WHO is the User:Joshualeverburg1 EmilyChen0 (talk) 04:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]