User talk:Emijrp/2007

Archive: 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - See current talks here

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Emijrp. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

commons:User:Emijrpbot

Hola

Your plan for copying Spanish comments into Commons seems good, but some points should be revised:

The image size section should be avoided and not copied into Commons (unlike here)
All editions should be revised by a human, since Wikipedia footnotes might be unadequated or out-of context (like in here). This one's strange too. 22:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Ping this, FYI. Your activities seem to have drawn a lot of heat! Cheers // FrankB 18:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

It would be super if you finish all the Spanish places. As we're approaching the 2 mill mark these should really have articles already. I'm currently doing France 85% of which is still missing. Keep up the good work ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 09:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

All geo contributions are very valuable indeed. Eventually they can develop into more detailed articles that eventually will have images. You'd be amazed how many stubs i started a year or two ago which now have a full detailed article! Happy edits go for it my son!!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 10:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

For the small settlements I wouldn't use the word city. I would use a municipality or small town or village or something ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 10:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Bot?

Are you running a bot?

You have 4 edits in a min for several mins. If you want to run a bot, you need permission first. --TheJosh 14:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering that myself. Either that or this editor is a pure machine :) Spryde 14:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

It is clearly a bot, looks just like edits my bot made before I got the bot flag --TheJosh 14:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

This account appears to be editing at a high rate of speed making bot-like edits and ignoring comments on this talk page. As such, I have blocked it. All bots must be approved at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval and should be given a bot flag after approval. You can still edit this talk page, please respond to these comments if you wish to be unblocked so you can register or return to normal editing. Mr.Z-man 14:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

¿Do I need a flag for to create new articles? --Emijrp 14:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If you are going to be doing it at edit rates as high as 12 per minute, yes. Mr.Z-man 14:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then say me a tolerable rate. --Emijrp 15:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Emijrp, a rate of 6 edits per minute or less is acceptable. This isn't because of the load on the servers; they can handle a lot of edits. But fast editing does flood the "recent changes" list which is watched by living people; bot edits are hidden ignored by this list. That's the most important reason we ask users who don't have a bot flag to keep their edit rate low.

If you would like help with the process of getting a bot flag, I would be glad to help you with the process. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Listen. It's not that we dislike what you're doing. The articles you're creating, they're good articles, and we appreciate it. But making 12 edits/minute for several minutes in a row, that's an indication that you're using a bot.

It's okay to use a bot, as long as you have permission. You've shown that you're using the bot well, that you're doing good things with it. Your only mistake was that you didn't ask permission first. The reason that you have to ask permission just like everyone else is that, if we let you use a bot without getting permission, many other people would start using bots without permission also. So just file a request for a Bot Flag, and once you receive it, you can continue.

Okay? DS 15:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Sounds silly to me. Editors should be free to contribute in any way they want. The quick and more efficient things can be done the better surely. Keep up the good work! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

There are sound reasons for the bot approval process that we use. It's easy to get bot approval for any noncontroversial task. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The bot's edit summaries

Polbot used to make edit summaries clearly explaining what she was doing ("Autogenerating article") and where she was getting the article from (a website repository of known threatened species) so if you could do something similar, it might be more helpful for us. I saw you in IRC so I thought I'd let you know. --70.179.175.240 04:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

In the next province --Emijrp 04:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Articles

Hello. Your bot is doing a great job. Can you however please change "the municipality has a population of 10208 inhabitants" to "the municipality has a population of 10,208"? The word "inhabitants" is not necessary, and if you could add the comma that would be great. Thanks. —METS501 (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Done --Emijrp 04:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

BOTijo

You were approved for 12 edits per minute, not the 30-40 epm the bot is doing. Q ^{T C} 07:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

To get the 2mil article, no doubt! Phgao 08:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

When you reprogrammed BOTijo to only create main article pages (during when you said "Long life to Wikipedia!"), your bot didn't create ancillary pages (talk pages, redirects, etc.) that it has been doing. I understand it was to try to get one of your articles to become the 2,000,000th. Will it go back and create those ancillary pages? Moreover, how soon will your bot run again? I really like bots who autogenerate articles. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 11:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

You crazy mother crunker!!! 2000 new articles in 12 hours!!!! Whats the chances you have 2 millionth huh?But don't stop these places till need completing 2 f......g million articles is awesome!!!!!!!!!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 11:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Your bot make the 2 000 000 article!!!--User:pdxx123 17:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

El Hormiguero

Alkivar just nominated El Hormiguero for deletion for not being notable. This request is inevitable with high profile articles such as this, and it needs to be flushed out to establish the notability of the article. (Wikipedia's one millionth article was nominated for deletion twice) Thus, I'm hoping you (and some of the other editors from Spain) can add more evidence establishing its notability so it's not nominated again in the future. Some people think that just because the subject isn't known in the United States, that it isn't notable. Zzxc 05:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

User:BOTijo

I have blocked this bot for going too fast, please slow down to 12 epm, thanks. (you are flooding the article creation logs, not the same as recent changes as far as my understanding goes). —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 07:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

When will BOTijo run again?

I love your bot. I think we should accelerate the new rush to reach 2.5 million with the help of your bot. When will BOTijo run again? Thanks. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 06:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Almost all Spanish municipalities are created, and I haven't thought another task to create municipalities of another countries :( --Emijrp 06:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

You still have some redlinks- Cantabria, Albacete and others as of this writing. For the other non-redlinks, you haven't put "done!" next to them so I know there are still some more there. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 17:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

So is your bot going to create the municipalities that still haven't been created yet or will BOTijo really not run again despite that? --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 01:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Fantastic job with BOTijo, Emijrp ! Anyway, I've discovered that some municipalities don't show. Some of them have a name that corresponds to an already existing page, but others don't. For example, for the Teruel province, that you mark as done, these towns link to a page with the same name but unrelated : Alba, Aliaga, Bello, Calomarde, Cella, Cosa, Cucalón, Galve, Gargallo, Molinos, Olba, Rubiales, San Agustín, Santa Eulalia, Seno, Valbona. Furthermore, these pages are empty : Bea, Cuevas Labradas, Escucha, Fonfría, Plou, Villastar. Can this be fixed ? If I can help in any way, just tell me ! - Jotamar 16:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jotamar (talk • contribs)

Another DEFAULTSORT bot!

I just came across Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BOTijo 5. There seem to be quite a few DEFAULTSORT-adding bots. I know of at least one more (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SmackBot XIII was for stubs), and several scripts for doing similar adding of DEFAULTSORTs. I'd like to ask, as I always do, if you have any idea how many articles do not have DEFAULTSORT in them, and if there is any way to take a group of articles (eg. those with the {{WPBiography}} template on their talk page) and find out which ones have DEFAULTSORT on them or not?

I ask because I still hope to one day see a supercategory that lists all articles about people in alphabetical order. At the moment, there is no such super-category (people articles are distributed among the subcategories of Category:People). We have something close for living people - Category:Living people - but the closest for all people is Category:Biography articles with listas parameter, though this depends on the listas parameter in {{WPBiography}} being synchronised with DEFAULTSORT (this is not yet the case).

Anyway, as someone running a bot on this, I was wondering if you had any insight or helpful advice? Some of the history of my stalled attempt to address this can be seen at User:Polbot/ideas/defaultsort, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Polbot 3, and User:Carcharoth/Polbot3 trial run and in particular, User talk:Carcharoth/Polbot3 trial run. Carcharoth 03:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on my talk page. Carcharoth 07:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Some more thoughts

I've been looking through the bot's contributions, and I noticed the following stuff that will need correction by humans later:

Category pipe sort was wrong - should be sorted by either von Prel or Prel (can never remember which), as Freiherr is a German baron. See Joseph Freiherr von Eichendorff for a correctly sorted example.
Accented character in sortkey - not a major problem here (should be Porges, Jules, instead of Porgès, Jules), as the accented character is not near the start of the first sort key, but this can be a problem in other cases, and for consistency it is best to change accented characters to non-accented characters, and so on.

For more on the above two examples, see Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category. In particular, the bit about accented and other special characters ("Punctuation, such as apostrophes and colons (but not hyphens) should be removed, and accented letters and ligatures should be replaced by their unaccented or separated counterparts") and the bit about German names and capitalisation (that is very important). So the first example above should be "Prel, Karl Freiherr Von". I realise that your bot is only copying what others wrote, but would it be possible to get the bot to make minor corrections such as capitalising each word in the sort key, and replacing accented and other special characters? Or would you need to get a new bot request for that? Carcharoth 08:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Amazing picture finding bot!

User:BOTijo/Sandbox - do my eyes deceive me? Is your bot managing to find pictures on Commons for use in articles that don't yet have those images? That deserves more than just a barnstar! Carcharoth 07:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Stubs to bottom

Why your bot moves stubs templates to bottom? [1] --Emijrp 10:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

This is part of WP:AWB general fixes. The reason is that (a) we want a place we can find the stub templates, and (b) after the categories means the stub cats are listed at the end of the category list.Rich Farmbrough, 11:57 13 October 2007 (GMT).

Wikipedia Automated Task Requests

Your assistance is needed at the following task requests:

Thank you, — madman bum and angel 13:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Your bot is messing up articles. Please see Jimmie Dale Gilmore TheMindsEye 05:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your warning. This ocurred during lag problems yesterday. I don't understand why, but about 18:24 there was lag issues. I have revised bot's edits and it only destroyed 11 articles. You can see it here, in the middle of page:

    18:24 Demetris Th. Gotsis‎ (2 changes) . . (-694) . . (Page history) [BOTijo‎; ImageRemovalBot‎]
mb  18:24 (cur; last) . . (-726) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
b  07:08 (cur; last) . . (+32) . . ImageRemovalBot (Talk | contribs) (Removing deleted image)
mb  18:24 Ralph Doubell (diff; hist) . .  (-2,363) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Kathleen Neal Cleaver (diff; hist) . .  (-4,833) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Jimmie Dale Gilmore (diff; hist) . .  (-3,008) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 John Clarke (mountaineer) (diff; hist) . .  (-197) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Diana Darvey (diff; hist) . .  (-3,658) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Peter Donaldson (diff; hist) . .  (-2,678) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Norman Doyle (diff; hist) . .  (-1,730) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 John R. English (diff; hist) . .  (-2,099) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Predrag Dragić (diff; hist) . .  (-559) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Butch Felker (diff; hist) . .  (-2,481) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)
mb  18:24 Tom Freston (diff; hist) . .  (-3,236) . . BOTijo (Talk | contribs) (+DEFAULTSORT)

Thanks very much. --Emijrp 10:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Emi Emi Emi!

Long time no see, amigo!--Ali K 11:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Enzymes

Did you remember my enzymes-stubs in :es? I mean es:EcoRII and others. Well, I have translated the first one. It's time to contribute here, too. Regards. ---- Retama (talk) 18:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

YOU FORGOT ENGLISH INTERWIKI! :P I'm scared to write my first english article. ---- Emijrp (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

In spanish wikipedia we are more relaxed, you know, xd. Put attention here: Image:Revisando.png. Regards ---- Retama (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

WOW, it's a fine method to check what edits have passed the censure machine. What will be the next step to conquer the world? ---- Emijrp (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Could be... Who knows? --Paintman 20:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

1,000,000 edits

Your bot is near to 1,000,000 edits. Congratulations. --Emijrp 14:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Goodness! How did you happen to spot this? It joins Cydebot in a very small group. Thanks for letting me know. Rich Farmbrough, 15:52 15 November 2007 (GMT).

HMS Porpoise

Thanks for tidying that up. Nick mallory (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Cheers. --Emijrp (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Manuel Bulnes Pinto

Hello. I've removed the image that you added to the article on Manuel Bulnes Pinto since it doesn't correspond to that person but rather to Manuel Bulnes Prieto, his father with whom he shared the name. Mel Romero (talk) 00:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I copied from it:Manuel Bulnes :(. There is the same mistake there. --Emijrp (talk) 12:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Images

Hi. I have illustrated five articles. Thanks, Auroranorth (!) 12:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hehehe. Did I forget anything? :P I'm making your barnstar. --Emijrp (talk) 12:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Auroranorth (!) 13:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Your bot request

Hi Emijrp I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BOTijo 6 has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Changing National Language

In a recent edit to the page Donkey, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Thank you. Hint: in American English, commas go before the quotes, so there was no need to change the article.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 10:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

in American English, commas go before the quotes, so there was no need to change the article.

What??? That quotes are wikisyntax, not grammatical quotes. Furthermore, if you put comma before quote '' then comma is in italic. --Emijrp (talk) 10:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Oops, I couldn't see what types of quotes were used. I'm sorry to bother you.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind. Emijrp (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi bot operator expert!

Hi Emijrp!

When I try to execute your code from here I get the following error: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 9: ordinal not in range(128). As you really are a bot operator expert it should be really easy for you to detect the error. Thanks. --Paintman 16:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

A question on your statistics

The page says that there were 2.7 million deletes as of September 2007, but doesn't make it clear if these were only articles, or all types of pages. Could you clarify?

Thanks. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

1,200,000 pages on namespace 0. --Emijrp (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Super - thanks for the quick response. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 13:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar:

Thanks a bunch for the barnstar! It was appreciated... :) Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 00:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Template messages/Redirect pages

Actually, on my last edit of the page's "WYSIWYG" example, I intended for the inconsistency of two templates being smooshed together and one all by its lonely self, in order to demonstrate that either way works. It does happen not to look very nice, so maybe the page should say something like "For the sake of style, please be consistent on each redirect page"…? Anyway, sorry to bother you about it… have a good day and all that jazz :) $\sim$ Lenoxus " * " 04:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicated images

Greetings! I'm quite enamored with your User:Emijrp/Duplicated images pages! It would be useful for me if this page included the page(s) each images is used on. That way I can tell which (if either) copy is used, and I can know which to delete. Would this be possible? Thanks, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I'm glad you like the tool. You can know what articles use one image looking "filelinks" section. Perhaps, you think that it is slow, but sometimes two images are duplicated and they are different quality, for example. Then you need to open both images, 1 and 2 to check what is the better, so it is a necessary step open each image before delete. --Emijrp 15:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, good point. Thanks. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 18:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Escape Character

Hi. I'm not an admin, so I hope it's ok that I've started clearing out mistakes on the duplicate image pages. I just thought I'd let you know that whatever script you're running incorrectly escapes certain characters (i've only found apostrophes to be a problem so far), so that the resulting gallery has an incorrect image entry (such as Image:Foo\'s Bar.jpg where the real name is Image:Foo's Bar.jpg)... I've removed the escape characters from those that I've found (only done page 1 so far). Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I knew the problem, but it is an ascii-unicode issue :( I have to improve the script. Thanks for your time. --Emijrp 16:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, as a non-admin, I've done all I can -- fixed the escapes, removed non-duplicates and already-dones on each page. Good luck to you admins with the tough job! Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and thanks for the star, I just saw it. I appreciate it! Hope I helped. --Storkk (talk) 15:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Greetings. I edited User:Emijrp/Duplicated images/Header for grammar and clarity. Hope you don't mind! – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for that, english isn't my native language. I've read in your userpage that you are the creator of Polbot. It created a lot of articles of species, it was a great job, I remember newpages log when it was running. Cheers. Emijrp (talk) 18:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Bot issue

Hi, your bot made this edit tagging a good stub about a journal as a test page. Just letting you know so that you can improve it :) Stifle (talk) 17:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I'm checking each edit, and it is running slow. I'm trying to do a bot that catch vandalism/test/rubbish/shortest pages in newpages log, but it is a bit hard. Thanks. --Emijrp (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Silly redirects?

OK. I accept that your bot doesn't create silly redirects. But why did it do this? --Russ (talk) 01:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Because of Hoary made an autoredirect. --Emijrp (talk) 12:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

As I understand it, your bot acts whenever it finds redirect.lower() == origin.lower(). However, it also should be checking to be sure that redirect != origin . --Russ (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

That is a very odd case. Autoredirects are mistakes. My bot has categorized 250,000 redirects and there was only one autoredirect. --Emijrp (talk) 09:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it is an odd case, but people do make mistakes and it's very easy to check for. --Russ (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I can imagine that it's very difficult for a bot to create or modify disambiguation pages. So they'll have to be modified by hand. I volunteer to do it for Aragon, with some more volunteers we can complete the job. The trouble is that, for example for Aliaga (Teruel), not only the disambiguation page isn't modified, but the possible pages Aliaga (Teruel) or Aliaga (Spain) don't exist either. That's what I don't understand. --Jotamar (talk) 15:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I've modified bad links and added a map for the Teruel province. I'll try to do the same for Zaragoza and Huesca if I have the time. Check the map, for example here : Ababuj.--Jotamar (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice, althought it may be inside infobox. I don't know if it's possible with the current parameters. --Emijrp (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount

Hello Emijrp,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. 00:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
P.S:Merry Christmas! :)

¡Feliz Navidad!

En es:wiki te echamos de menos, espero que este próximo año todo te vaya muy bien. Un gran abrazo, Mercedes 22:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Gracias, felices fiestas a ti también. ;) --Emijrp (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

biography images

Your webpage script completely crashes encoding in articles [2]

--WarX (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I was fixing it. Now it works fin. If you see more problems, tell me. --Emijrp (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Defaultsort

I'm not sure it matters, and I don't need a response, but if your bot is doing "defaultsort"s (and I'm extremely happy that it is), perhaps it could sort the categories? And if it does that, maybe have "XXXX births", "XXXX deaths" and/or "living people" be first, followed by an alpha sort of the cats? Just a suggestion from a fellow bot owner - feel free to ignore :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Commons -> Dutch Wikipedia

Hi, just wanted to let know that I have deleted w:nl:Gebruiker:Emijrp/Commons and accompanying talk page, as all articles listed have now been checked and pictures and/or links to Commons added. Thanks for providing us with this list! Have a great 2008. Regards, Jvhertum (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Please, delete complete entries

Please, delete complete entries. --Emijrp (talk) 12:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I just assumed a bot would take care of it soon enough. I'll be sure to manually delete them from now on. Thanks! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 16:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Booya!

The first biography page to be complete eliminated: User:BOTijo/Images for biographies/9.

That was fun. Can't wait to take out the rest. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Try again, I've cleared it out again. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

:O Emijrp (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

...and another two: User:BOTijo/Images for biographies/3 and User:BOTijo/Images for biographies/7. Whee! EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Feliz año nuevo, Emijrp y gracias por el regalito que nos haces con este proyecto de imágenes para biografías. Me parece fascinante. Un saludo y otra página vacía :) --Javier Carro (talk) 15:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Gracias por trabajar en ella. Feliz año. Cuídate. --Emijrp (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)