User talk:ElviraCardigan

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from George Sanders. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Unless the sections are blatently false it's better to mark them with {{Citation needed}} rather than delete them. If the whole article needs more references it can be tagged with {{Refimprove}} NtheP (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the welcome, I actually thought I did give a reason in my edit summary. I thought the section had no sources quoted. Sorry ifI forgot to specify! I take your point about the 'citations needed' option. --ElviraCardigan (talk) 12:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A topic of interest to you is covered by discretionary sanctions under an Arbcom case

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Shakespeare authorship question if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question#Final decision. Tom Reedy (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]