User talk:Eludium-q36

Welcome!

Hello, Eludium-q36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Jeff3000 21:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to Objective

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something Objective, please do not link to Objective, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Objectivity (science) by writing out [[Objectivity (science)|objective]]. Regards, Jeff3000 21:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Mills

I appreciate that AfDs are rarely unanimous and those on the losing side may well be disappointed, but to me the issue looked clear-cut. I must point out that the closing admin normally just says "Keep", "Delete" or "No consensus" without giving reasons. However, my reasoning was that I looked at the debate, and the arguments on both sides, and concluded that the arguments for deletion were stronger than those for retention. You do have the right to make an appeal on Wikipedia:Deletion_review.--Runcorn 10:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (2nd nomination)

You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (second nomination). This was closed as speedy keep under criterion for speedy deletion G5 as a page created by a banned user, and its content deleted. You may or may not want to contribute to the new discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.pro-wrestling (2nd nomination). This message is being given to all users - except proven sockpuppets and those who have already appeared at the new Afd- who contributed in the original discussion. --Robdurbar 14:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JykriN

I commented favorably, but it would be stronger if you had a third source from a different publication than the other two. DGG 18:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, there is something here-good job on that one, I couldn't find much at all! I've withdrawn the nomination accordingly. Seraphimblade 18:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jyrki Niskanen

Great rescue job on the Jyrki Niskanen article - made me smile to see that. Cheers, CiaranG 19:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raven Article

Eludium. Why do you INSIST on removing the edits made by the Online Editor of Raven, Martin Mackenzie, username mmackenzie? He DOES know rather more about Raven than you you know!! And also why do you INSIST on removing the link to the Raven forum? When the Raven editor himself put it there? And it is relevant to the subject topic!

Please stop doing these things as you are being a hindrance not a help to the accurate and best service to Raven.

- Jules** 21:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Eludium-q36/Deal or No Deal (UK game show) Records

User:Eludium-q36/Deal or No Deal (UK game show) Records, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eludium-q36/Deal or No Deal (UK game show) Records and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Eludium-q36/Deal or No Deal (UK game show) Records during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]