User talk:Eluard

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Cuckoo being fed by "mother" magpie.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Cuckoo being fed by magpie.jpg. The copy called Image:Cuckoo being fed by magpie.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 09:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eluard, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

By the way, thank you for the image, I have moved it to Channel-billed Cuckoo since it is a different species from the Asian Koel. Good luck, and have fun. --Sabine's Sunbird talk 21:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo

I've just reverted your edit re the fingerprint and Middle Eastern background. The problem is that the information that is stated there is referenced. Your addition of "Mediterranean" and "weakly" were not referenced and so were statements of your personal opinion. You can't revert to personal opinion or personal research on Wiki. Thoses are the rules.

With regards to the fingerprint and its whorls, a statement has been made that the fingerprint has a characteristic that is found in Middle Eastern fingerprints. But I have never been able to get an answer to the question as to whether that characteristic is also found in Italian fingerprints, or whether it is found in other 15th century Florentine fingerprints specifically. There is no way of assessing the validity of the statement that the fingerprint nbelongs to someone of Middle Eastern origin unless this fact is forthcoming. Even if the characterisic was only found in a relatively small number of Italians, then it negates the assertion. None of the information presented to the public on this matter has been detailed or scientific.

Despite this, I cannot offer my opinions, in the context of a Wikipedia article. Amandajm (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of the problems with Leonardo is that the whole world owns him, and every idiot knows at least one "fact" about him, all of which demand insertion. Sometimes one just takes a pragmatic approach. (I suppose it's self preservation) In the case of Leo's thumbprint, if you say that Leonardo probably wasn't of Middle Eastern origin, then you are obviously racist, because anything worth having in the West originated in the Islamic Middle East. Or so we are expected to believe.

Can I suggest that you take a look at the page List of paintings by Leonardo da Vinci. There has been a protracted discussion about a painting recently acquired by an American tycoon and which he insists is Leonardo. At least, I suppose that he is the person who continually editted the article until it was locked. I don't know who else would do so. Amandajm (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eluard!

I just want to point out a couple of small things about Wikipedia protocol.

Firstly, here, and on many other websites, it is considered "bad manners" to use capital letters when you are posting a message to another person, or writing in a forum. It's the equivalent of shouting at a person. Use italics or bold for emphasis, not caps.
Secondly, you'll notice that most people sign off in a way that allows you to access their talk page, and also gives the date. It's easy to do this. As long as you are signed in, the Wiki program recognizes you. All you have to do is type four little squiggles, which are probably located on the extreme upper left of our keyboard, near number 1. This will insert your name and the time and date automatically.

Amandajm (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this Amanda. I have to say that I've been reluctant to learn yet another mark-up language, but I agree that if I am going to be involved in trying to make Wikipedia articles more useful then it is something I need to do.

I also want to point out that although I may seem slack for not checking every detail as it gets persitently inserted, I am watching a very large number of articles, some of which get vandalised almost daily.

Let me warn you- when you go to edit an article, it is always a good idea to look at the edit history first. You frequently find that the last edit was by a vandal. If you add a proper edit, and don't revert the vandalism first, then you consolidate the vandalism and it may remain for months. Some vandals just delete sections or write rude words. Others are extraordinarily sneaky and make what appear to be bonafide changes, which may actually pass for "improvements" or "corrections". If you see any recent edits by people who have numbers rather than names, check them out before you edit. This is the reason why the Leonardo article is usually "locked". Take a look at the recent edit history of Giotto and you'll see what I mean.

Amandajm (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks for this too. I have done a bit of research on Fra Angelico and in fact have written a play based on his life so I might take a look at the page on him. Giotto is one of my favourite artists so I dread to think what has been done to him.