User talk:Elsie Cacayorin

Welcome!

Hello, Elsie Cacayorin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as History of Information Technology in Libraries, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 03:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of Information Technology in Libraries

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on History of Information Technology in Libraries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 03:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ten Key Developments in Information Technology

The article Ten Key Developments in Information Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research, and a possible speedy deletion candidate under A10.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 07:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability guidelines

Hi, I'm writing on your talk page because I've noticed that you have uploaded what looks to be several personal papers to Wikipedia. Please be aware that the content given looks to be original research on your part and resembles a student essay or project. This doesn't mean that your work is "bad" per se, but it doesn't fit the guidelines for what Wikipedia will include in the mainspace. Please be aware that while we do try to be as inclusive as possible here, we are not a repository for student papers or anything of that nature. (WP:NOT) If you are doing this as part of a student project (by this I mean that your professor asked you to contribute to Wikipedia), I would highly recommend that he gets in contact with Wikipedia:School and university projects. This way he or she can become acquainted with the other educators in the project as well as brush up on what Wikipedia requires for its pages. If you uploaded by yourself (meaning no professor told you to do this), be aware that uploading your student papers onto Wikipedia can be seen as a form of self-promotion. I would recommend against re-uploading any of the papers or continuing to upload anything of this nature, as this could lead to you being blocked from Wikipedia editing.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Information Technology in Libraries

The article Information Technology in Libraries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research, looks to be one of several student papers uploaded to Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Information Technology in Libraries for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Information Technology in Libraries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Technology in Libraries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 03:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Security Issues in Libraries, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please do not upload essays to Wikipedia. We cannot accept original research. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As one of the admins here, with a long outside career as a library and teacher in a library school, let me give you some advice. We need more librarians and library school students here; there are a few dozen of us (see WP:Wikiproject Libraries )and a great deal of work to be done. That wikiproject page has a list of needed articles, and articles that need improvement; although we do have articles of most basic concepts, as a first approximation, any article on librarianship and information science is very much in need of improvement, and there are hundreds of notable librarians who do not have articles. But they have to be written as Wikipedia articles, as organized summaries of published knowledge in prose form, not outlines, based on references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online. We avoid giving our own opinions, or synthesizing material as in original research -- this is exactly the opposite of what is required in college papers. (See WP:FIRST for a further explanation. My advice to people coming here, is to start by adding references to existing articles, and then go on to adding sections to existing articles, before beginning to write new ones. If I can help you further, ask me at my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]