User talk:Elm478

Welcome

Hello, Elm478, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elchin Khalilov

I dont have time right now to look closely, but some things that may be happening that you should be aware of:

Content must be verified as having been published in reliable sources (ie third parties with reputations for fact checking and accuracy, not blogs or other self published content.
- This is particularly true regarding content about living people.
Content must be presented in a neutral point of view, this includes giving information "good" and "bad" in roughly the same the proportion that the events are covered by reliable sources and claims must not be empty hyperbole.
Beware of getting into edit wars - if someone disagrees with your changes, discuss it on the talk page and find a way to present content that all people can agree.

Hope that helps for now. Active Banana (talk) 17:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Hello, Elm478. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue.

Fair use rationale for File:Kapitsa diploma.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kapitsa diploma.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adam in MO Talk 22:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you user Ishmail_Valiyev ?--Adam in MO Talk 16:42, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't understand what does it means? Elm478 (talk) 05:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same person who used the Wikipedia account, Ismail Valiyev?--Adam in MO Talk 22:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the same person who used the Wikipedia account, Ismail Valiyev. Elm478 (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kapitsa diploma.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kapitsa diploma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ThoughtAudio Review Request

I am seeking independent and neutral viewpoints on the article ThoughtAudio, which is being considered for deletion. If you have a few minutes to review it, I would appreciate your article contributions and opinion on the decision as to whether it merits being retained and improved, or deleted. ThoughtAudio was targeted by the same editor that made a failed attempt to delete the wikiquote article Michael Scott Gallegos. There are only 3 reviews/votes so far. I am hoping that a minority viewpoint as to the worthiness of the article will not prevail. My work is mainly in the creation of new wikiquote articles @ELApro and time is rarely spent in unproductive controversy. I am a long time editor for Wikipedia, but have not created many articles here. I would much appreciate your advice and/or contributions with regard to the process. ELApro (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]