User talk:Ellenrich

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ellenrich. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:IMDB and familiarize yourself with what is and isn't a reliable source. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, IMDB cannot be used as a reference. See WP:IMDB. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK.Sorry. I thought they were reliable. Ellenrich (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

On Wikipedia, all stated facts should be supported by a citation to a reliable source. Currently, large portions of this draft are unsourced - please add necessary citations before resubmitting. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 20:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ellenrich! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 20:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No relevant improvements since last decline. Furthermore, the new section "Three coincidental deaths" is synthesis and not allowed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) has been accepted

Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntientNestor (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AntientNestor. Thankyou so much for your quick reply and for being so patient with me. Thanks also for telling me to place my internet links to Newspaper Obituaries in the References section and not in the External links. I shall work on improving the article. Happy editing and advising to you!

Ellenrich Ellenrich (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AntientNestor, This is incredible! In the space of a couple of hours other users have added three more references! Brilliant! Ellenrich (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashmore deserves an article. I'll be watching its development with keen interest. AntientNestor (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation on Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor)

Hello Ellenrich! Your additions to Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page.

I'm deeply embarrassed by this, because I should have picked up on this before accepting the article—sorry.

There's no suggestion that you're "passing off", because you included the source as a reference. Thank you. --AntientNestor (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The final paragraph was taken from the Guardian Obituary, called The Director's Cut written by Philip Purser. Can I include it as a quotation with marks "..." citing the source? What is the maximum amount of words permitted in a quotation? AntientNestor, I look forward to your reply. Ellenrich (talk) 12:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the rules re direct quotations and have added the lines from the Guardian Obituary. Hope you like look of it. Ellenrich. Ellenrich (talk) 13:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an improvement, but going by WP:QUOTE I'd describe it as "marginal", at best. However, if you're going to give it a run, please give Philip Purser a wikilink. The page will be the subject of a further review soon, with a second opinion. If the second reviewer doesn't agree, I'm likely to get a telling off—Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

If the paragraph survives, the next stages are wikilinks for everyone and everywhere else, throughout the article, and a standard format for the references. The maintenance tags at the top of the page can be removed then.--AntientNestor (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AntientNestor, I cannot give Philip Purser a wikilink because he died 01/08/2022 at the age of 96. Ellenrich (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just place square brackets round the name, like this: [[Philip Purser]]. The words will turn blue and when clicked will link to the article. AntientNestor (talk) 16:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I went to edit my References section all refs had disappeared! But the refs are present in Read mode. All I can see under the heading is

Can you please help me? Ellenrich (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "References" section can't be edited directly. The {{Reflist}} tag automatically generates a numbered list of references from the <ref></ref> pairs placed (in edit mode) where necessary in the article text. The references pop into view when you switch from edit mode to a viewable mode—"Preview" or "Publish". More at WP:INTREF2.

At present there 20 references, which is good for an article this size.--AntientNestor (talk) 21:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find the Adam Benedict reference you cite from The Independent, but not the obituary from The Daily Telegraph (only the that of the admiral of the same name). Is it right?--AntientNestor (talk) 08:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found the Daily Telegraph obituary but could only look at it in small scale because it was on Newspapers.com subscription site. Yes, only free the one is about the admiral. The Stage newspaper and Guardian obituaries are also only on that subscription site. Maybe they are free to view somewhere else. Thanks for looking! Ellenrich (talk) 11:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you combine the Telegraph refs, using the <ref name=DT>{{cite news}}</ref> format, like I did with Benedick?

I had a PAYG account with The Stage, but my credits kept timing out before I could use them, so I closed it. The Guardian's usually free to view. AntientNestor (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand how to combine the Telegraph refs using the code you provided. I cannot visualize it. Ellenrich (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Hickman

I have made a requested move at Talk:Charles Hickman (theatre director and actor).

I was curious as to why you removed a lot of the useful links. Wikipedia articles are written by people who are knowledgeable and interested in a subject to be read by people who may not be that knowledgeable in the subject. So having links to terms that are not so common to the general reader, such as [[Chigwell School]], [[RADA|Royal Academy of Dramatic Art]], and [[West End theatre]]s, serve to help the reader gain an understanding of what they are reading about.

Also editors templates such as {{Use dmy dates}} and {{Use British English}} should be left in place. They help to promote consistent date and spelling formatting. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that R.A.D.A is a useful link and I will put it back. Chigwell School has no bearing on my article. West End theatre is too vague a topic but I did leave other individual theatre links. However, someone, maybe not you, put links to New York and London which are a complete distractions and way off my topic. Ellenrich (talk) 18:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the New York and London but Chigwell School does have a bearing on the article in that it allows the reader to see what his background and education was. By the way please read WP:OWN. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]