User talk:Ellenberkley/sandbox

Foundations 2 2019, Group 3B Peer Review

Respond to peer review prompts on the ARTICLE talk page, following the statement made the group about its planned edits.

1. All group members should respond to the following prompts, with specific examples:

· Do the group’s edits improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

-- Yes, group 3c's edits expanded heavily on the medical uses of hysterectomy besides as a last resort for disease states, such as trans people undergoing hysterectomy to treat body dysphoria and to prevent future gynecologic problems. --Dannymrowr (talk) 20:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

· Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

-- Yes, group 3c's goal was to expand on the medical uses section, and the section has been expanded on substantially to cover as many bases as possible --Dannymrowr (talk) 20:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2. Each group should divide up the prompts below so that a different person responds to each question. Please sign your comments with your name and account name so that you receive credit.

· Person A: Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…

-- Yes, no opinions were stated and the information was presented as purely factual information with proper citation --Dannymrowr (talk) 20:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

· Person B: Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? If not, specify…

· Person C. Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? If not, specify…

· Person D. Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation? If yes, specify…