User talk:ElleAlba

Esther Kuhn

I didn't "review" it, I just removed categories from it because draft pages aren't allowed to be filed in categories as if they were already finished articles in articlespace. That's not the same thing.

As for why it hasn't been reviewed or accepted by anybody else, well, you haven't submitted it to be reviewed, as witness the fact that it doesn't have and never has had an {{AFC submission}} template on it at all. Drafts aren't automatically considered or reviewed the moment they exist, and submitting a draft for review is distinct from merely creating one. I can tell you that it would be declined by any AFC reviewer in its current state, because it mostly isn't referenced to WP:GNG-worthy reliable sources — you don't establish the notability of an actress by referencing her roles to IMDb, other IMDb-like directories or directly-affiliated press releases from the studios that made the films or TV shows she was in as proof that the roles happened, you establish the notability of an actress by referencing her roles to journalistic coverage about her performances in media as proof that the roles have been externally validated as significant. And while a couple of the references appear to meet that standard, most of them don't, and the ones that do don't add up to enough.

So an AFC reviewer would reject it in its current state, and tell you to find better referencing and try again — but one of the main reasons it hasn't already been reviewed yet is because you haven't submitted it to be reviewed. And even if and when you do submit it to be reviewed, the process still takes a while, and it's highly unlikely that a review would happen within a day or two of when you submitted it. Bearcat (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bearcat,

thank you so much for your valuable information and the time you put in writing it. I will proceed in referencing the requested sources.

Best wishes

ElleAlba 2A02:2455:25F:1700:5B1:2401:CF9:42B (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Esther Kuhn (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Numerous unsourced statements. See also WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Esther Kuhn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElleAlba! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Esther Kuhn

Hello, ElleAlba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Esther Kuhn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Esther Kuhn

Hello, ElleAlba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Esther Kuhn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Liz,

I haven been checking the required the nfotmations for the article, though it's hard to decide which source would be suitable. But I definitly will try to get the right sources, so the page can be published. Thank you a lot, have a great year 2024.

Alba 2A02:2455:18A8:D800:E083:774C:D7FD:944B (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]