User talk:Ell-ninio11

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ell-ninio11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What have I been blocked for exactly??? This admin is out to get me Zzuuzz (talk⁺ • tag • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) - check my contributions! even my deleted contributions! everything is legit. I don't understand the problem here - Could an admin please check through this issue in depth, and reprimand the Zzuuzz for his actions?
And, if in the case where I am found to be the guilty party, how do my actions justify an indef-block?
Thanks --Ell-ninio11 (talk) 13:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what you mean by 'legit.' So far, your main contributions appear to be the addition of incorrect dates on a few articles. It's just the kind of subtle vandalism that can cause a lot of trouble in the encyclopedia. Of course, I could rethink this if I turn out to be wrong, but could you please add a reliable source for your date of 1937 for the release of Jefferson Airplane's song "White Rabbit?" — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ell-ninio11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sure, give me a chance to contribute to the encyclopedia, and i'll be sure to find a reliable source. I still don't see how my edits have justified an indef block! and for vandalism

Decline reason:

Sneaky vandalism by changing dates is still vandalism. Because this is obviously not your first account, I see no point in entertaining you further. Page protected. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 14:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's okay, you can add that source right here on your talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got my info from this book:

The Annotated Alice: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-glass, Lewis Carroll, Martin Gardner, John Tenniel Published by Norton, 2000

ISBN 0393048470, 9780393048476 312 pages --Ell-ninio11 (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of that book. Good book. It doesn't say that Jefferson Airplane released the song "White Rabbit" in 1937, though. At least, I can't find that claim; do you have a page number in that book where I can find that? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It varies for the various editions--Ell-ninio11 (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly no longer have time for this. I urge you to reconsider the block, and then keep me on your watchlist just in case I "vandalize" again. It reaqlly save me from having to go through the mailing list. You wouldn't wanna be held accountable wouldya? --Ell-ninio11 (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reprints all have the same pagination, but just give me the page number from your 2000 version, and I'll see if mine matches. If not, I work just a few blocks from a pretty large library, so I can look for a copy of the 2000 edition there. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page 39 gives a brief mention, page 188-189 has the bulk of the info. Check it up there. Now, unblock time? --Ell-ninio11 (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not editing from home right now, but I'll double-check my copy of that source after work today. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great, so as you don't have any current evidence to warrant an "indef-block" for vandalism, I suggest you unblock me now, until "proven guilty" (if you find that to be the case) - so to speak. Agreed? --Ell-ninio11 (talk) 14:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, because we both know that you're lying, right? But if I check your source and am shocked to learn that I was wrong, there'll be plenty of time for me to apologize. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]