User talk:Elizaruby18

April 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Harriet Tubman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Duplicate edit requests with no sourcing across multiple articles are disruptive. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at F. Scott Fitzgerald, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Danny DeVito, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Frankie Valli. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please communicate, or at the least provide secondary sources for these additions and edit requests. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elizaruby18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not mean to be disruptive. I am only updating Wikipedia pages of people who are inductees of the New Jersey Hall of Fame so that their pages accurately reflect their inductee status. Elizaruby18 (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you need to commit to being responsive to other editors, and sourcing all your edits. PhilKnight (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 02:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been unresponsive so I have had no choice but to block you. Also, adding random halls of fame to the lead sections of articles is never a good idea; see this similar case I had to deal with from a while ago. Graham87 02:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that if they're going to continue, they'll need independent secondary sources to demonstrate that coverage of any Hall of Fame membership is WP:DUE, rather than sourcing it to a Hall of Fame itself. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]