User talk:Eliko007/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eliko007. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Tomas Gorny. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paseo Mochis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:Lemongirl942, I'd recommend that you carefully read Wikipedia:Tag bombing. You've failed to explain why you believe the subject isn't notable (despite the abundance of sources in the article). The essay I cited offers a guideline to post your concerns to the talk page of the article and/or improve the article yourself. Slapping a tag on an article is akin to putting a bandage on an open wound: it doesn't really help. Eliko007 (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- It also seems that you might have potential COI concerns with respect to both of these articles. I'd recommend that you read the Wikipedia guidelines that discuss disclosure. Eliko007 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Are you a new editor? If you have had any previous accounts please declare them. It is very obvious that you have a conflict of interest. That article has attracted SPAs for quite a while. The last AFD closed with a "no consensus" that the subject was notable - hence the tag. If you feel the subject is notable, make your point on the talk page and get consensus for removing the tag. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- It also seems that you might have potential COI concerns with respect to both of these articles. I'd recommend that you read the Wikipedia guidelines that discuss disclosure. Eliko007 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tomas Gorny. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
January 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tomas Gorny. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Your posting on the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christianity/Noticeboard page is WP:canvassing. Such postings are required to be neutral and non-partisan in tone. Phrases such as "urgent" and putting a red triangle along side are hardly neutral. Your excuse that "Xenophrenic notified the atheism project" does not justify this, indeed Xenophrenic's edit is calm and neutral (requesting "Informed pro & con input based on Wikipedia policy and reliable sources"). I would suggest you consider this a friendly warning about your editing style, the alternative is to raise the issue at WP:ANI as per WP:CAN which causes all sorts of unpleasantness all round. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Maybe something more along the lines of:
Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_19#Category:Persecution_by_atheists
There is a discussion on the above page concerning the category "Persecution by atheists". user:Xenophrenic is requesting its deletion even though he has added Category:Persecution by Christians to some articles. He has already emptied the category of historical examples of persecution by atheists. Eliko007 (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
There is no need for the urgency, the matter is being discussed at length on Categories for discussion. Urgent would be continuing vandalism or similar matters requiring an immediate response. All IMHO of course, but generally WP prefers discussion and consensus over shouting and warfare! You'll also find that discussions like this ramble on for ages, if someone takes precipitous action it is likely to be reverted. Best wishes for your future editing, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Eliko007 and Martin of Sheffield. Just a few points of clarification:
- (1) Xenophrenic is just a co-nominator, along with Marcocapelle, who actually opened the discussion. And there are several other editors in that discussion who are also requesting the deletion of the category. My intent was to simply discuss renaming the category with its creator, Jobas, before initiating a much more time consuming CfD, but Marcocapelle opened it, so I joined in. Asking for more participation is fine (encouraged, in fact), but additionally painting it as a solo effort by Xenophrenic doesn't seem appropriate, in my opinion.
- (2) Xenophrenic has not "added Category:Persecution by Christians to some articles". Persecution by Christians was added to that article by Mateoski06, with whom Jobas has been edit-warring over that category for some time. The category did get re-inserted into the article as part of larger rollback or revert edits I made, but I didn't add it to the article. Painting the situation inaccurately as an effort by Xenophrenic to remove one category while adding another catetgory, doesn't seem appropriate, in my opinion.
- (3) Xenophrenic absolutely did not "empty the category of historical examples of persecution by atheists". The inappropriate category was removed from articles by many editors (not just by me - [1], [2], etc.), and I only removed it (or renamed it in many cases) from articles where it was completely unsupported by cited sources as required. And you are actually going to put "examples of persecution by atheists" in a canvass request, as if that is actually a thing? That is a conclusion argued by some of the participants in the discussion, and as such, is completely inappropriate to include in a neutral canvass notice.
- Hello Eliko007 and Martin of Sheffield. Just a few points of clarification:
- In short: Please do request additional participation in the discussion, but leave editors (i.e.; Xenophrenic) out of it. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Barnstar
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Thank you for your academic integrity, which helps keep Wikipedia a top-notch resource for the global community to use.Jobas (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC) |
- Thanks User:Jobas. My userpage now has a showroom for this! Eliko007 (talk) 20:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Eliko007, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Eliko007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC) |
- What kind of tea do you serve User:Rosiestep? Sorry for getting back to you late. As I say though, "better late than never". Eliko007 (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC) :)
- Hi Eliko. Thanks for circling back with me. We don't actually serve tea at the "virtual" Teahouse; we help newer editors with questions/answers on how to contribute to Wikipedia. That said, if I were at a real teahouse, I'd order a cup of blue eyes/hibiscus. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Tomas Gorny. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Do it! He only exists here to smack-talk about other people.
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yorkville, Toronto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omnibus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Tomas Gorny (businessman). You've been told before - stop removing tags on Tomas Gorny. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Please explain
The spammer-like edits at [3]? An experienced editor should not undo another's action without an explanation, particularly when we are dealing with simple spam cleanup. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
No admin is going to speedily delete that article, certainly not with that rationale (who is being disparaged?), and also certainly not when it's under discussion at AfD. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christian persecution complex; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is not forbidden to edit articles when they're at AfD, but edit warring over content when the sourcing is indeed from reliable sources is frowned upon. Have some faith in the process: if the article is kept, you'll have all the time in the world to fight over this or that passage. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
NewtonX, Inc.
Hello, Eliko007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. scope_creepTalk 20:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgewater Bank. Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of the arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. If your comments concerned a deletion discussion, please consider reading Wikipedia's deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process. We hope that you decide to stay and contribute even more. I assume your argument was done in good faith, but a quick Google web search does confirm that the Bridgewater Bank Canadian subsidiary is not the same as the Bridgewater Bank subsidiary of Bridgewater Bancshares you cited. As a point of fact, deleting this Bridgewater Bank page for this arguably non-notable small Canadian bank subsidiary that lacks significant coverage would free up that page URL for the Bridgewater Bancshares bank subsidiary (assuming, of course, that it, too, is notable). Thank you. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- As-Suwayda Governorate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
- Japanese Venezuelans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tim Berners-Lee into List of Christians in science and technology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Islam in Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Conversion
- Religion in Syria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Syrian Christians
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You cited Nisan 2002 in that article, but the full ref is missing. Could you add it? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Headbomb:, Sure.Eliko007 (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ablution in Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Christian culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Epiphany
- Czech Centres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New York
- Ethnic groups in Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to South Slavic
- Europeanisation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to European
- Francophile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
- Hinduism in Arab states (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
- Jewish Renaissance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Britain
- Kamal Jumblatt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Viterbo into Ablution in Christianity. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Requesting expansion and update edit support
Hi,
Season's greetings
I am looking for proactive expansion and update support/input help the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles, if possible. Even if you feel focus area bit different still contribution of few line may help bring in some different perspective and also help Wikipedia goal of neutrality. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.
Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Islam.
Thanks, warm regards and greetings
Bookku (talk) 16:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Walid Benmbarek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Aukai Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chechen
- Christian culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Communion
- Czech Centres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New York
- Nahed Hattar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
- Pashtuns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Christian
- Racism in the Arab world (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Coptic
- Zakaria Aboukhlal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Moroccan
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
"Hispanic Christian" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hispanic Christian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 4#Hispanic Christian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
OVERLINK
Please do not link to countries and nationalities etc. per WP:OVERLINK. GiantSnowman 20:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- You are still doing this, and as shown below, the links you are adding are also too vague (they redirect to disambiguation pages). Please stop adding links of this nature. GiantSnowman 08:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Bengali Muslims (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Conversion
- Episcopal Church (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Establishment
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenians in Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hagia Sophia into Eastern Orthodox Church. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Deir al-Asad
- added a link pointing to Crusader
- Eilabun
- added a link pointing to Palestine
- Tarabin Bedouin
- added a link pointing to Sinai
- Western Wall
- added a link pointing to Crusader
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Careful with ref names
Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'error:' in the versions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia
I think your edit largely consisted of copying material from Ablution_in_Christianity
This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.
I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 20:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ablution in Christianity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashkelon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women in Shinto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nambu.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)- For this edit to Religious persecution, where you copied content from Persecution of Zoroastrians without the required attribution. If you continue to not attribute in wiki copys, the next block will be indefinite. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Druze
- added a link pointing to Traveler
- Druze in Israel
- added a link pointing to Traveler
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Druze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traveler.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Religious education in primary and secondary education. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please do not link major country names, as per MOS:OVERLINK, and as you've twice already been requested to stop: User talk:Eliko007/Archive 1#OVERLINK. IamNotU (talk) 22:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Islamic terrorism in Bulgaria
A tag has been placed on Category:Islamic terrorism in Bulgaria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Awa Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanaga.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Some baklava for you!
|
Yes Finales891 (talk) 04:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Eliko007,
So you don't end up in an edit war with The good man 232 and possible get a block, please make use of the article talk page to discuss your differences with this editor. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Named references
Hello, while cleaning the backlog of Category:Pages with broken reference names, I noticed two edits on 28 May on the article Cultural Muslim, where a named reference was added but not the reference itself. They're respecively &diff=next&oldid=959301527 (ref name=history) and &diff=next&oldid=959311665 (ref name=:1). Do you remember where you got these? Then we can add them, replacing the "citation needed" tag I put. The relevant bits of text are:
Surveys conducted 1994 and 1996 observed a decrease in religiosity based on lowering mosque participation, less frequent prayer, dropping importance attached to a religious education, etc.{{r|history|page=242}} This decrease in religiosity was more visible in younger Muslims; however, other more recent studies show that while participation in religious activities among young Muslims is reducing, they are more likely to identify with Islam culturally.{{r|history|page=243}} A 2009 survey found that the majority of Muslims in Belgium supported "separation between religion and state." A 2010 study found that while Muslims put great emphasis on religious freedom and the overwhelming majority stated people should be free to leave Islam if they wanted, they were less comfortable with the idea of Muslims marrying non-Muslims.{{r|history|page=244}}
A 2004 study found that the importance of Islam in the lives of [[Dutch Muslims]], particularly of second-generation immigrants was decreasing. This observation was based on the reducing participation of younger Muslims in Islamic rituals, organizations, and prayer. The study also predicted that the trend would continue with increasing education and "individualization". However, the study also found that second-generation immigrants attached more importance to religion that the first generation as an "individual experience." The study concluded "the expression of religiosity by Muslim youth was not much different to that of their Dutch Christian or Jewish peers".{{r|:1|page1=178}}
Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Thank you. Wakari07 (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Armenian Genocide article
Hi, thanks for your edits to Armenian Genocide article. However, you may not be aware but per WP:LEADCITE it is not necessary to cite content in the lead as it is supposed to summarize the body and be cited there. I personally think that the citations can get in the way of readability for the average reader. (t · c) buidhe 15:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
I did not give any convincing argument !!!! The person who wants to delete the edit must give an argument as to why he wants to delete. The good man 232 (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
It's has a modest impact on Christians growth, but it's the largest net loses. The good man 232 (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Emdad Tafsir (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese civilization.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The accusation
My edits are biased!!! I am trying to make the articles on Wikipedia more neutral after you have turned these articles into Christian Evangelism pages, for example, you converted the article The Decline of Christianity into the Growth of Christianity. Also, Elizium23 alerted you about your biased edits [4]. And don't think that I don't know that you have another account by name "Christ worshiper". --The good man 232 (talk) 12:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
"Druze conversion to Christianity" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Druze conversion to Christianity. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 27#Druze conversion to Christianity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)