User talk:Elijahadmire

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neil Rackers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[John Burroughs School]] Linebacker/special teams coach (2013-present

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ben Tate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Houston Texans]] ({{NFL Year|2010}}–({{Nfl Year|2013}})

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mat McBriar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Pittsburgh Steelers]] ({{NFL Year|2013}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Curse of Ice Cube

The article The Curse of Ice Cube has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "news" event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Curse of Vanilla Ice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Curse of Vanilla Ice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of Vanilla Ice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Bagumba (talk) 03:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of Vanilla Ice, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Patrick Mannelly may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Chicago Bears]] ({{NFL Year|1998}}–({{NFL Year|2013}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graham Gano may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Baltimore Ravens]] as an [[undrafted free agent]] in 2009. He played [[college football]] at [[Florida State University].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free agents

The problem with many articles on players from a decade or so ago is that when they retire, it's just a quiet point where they stop playing and that's it. I've found players that stopped playing in 2004 but were never updated. Obviously they're done. The key is to update them. All you're doing is causing disruption that no one should have to be dealing with as they're trying to make articles current. Try actually updating the "free agent" articles rather than disrupting them. Wizardman 11:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Spurrier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Carr

In regards to your edit to David Carr recently, per Template:Infobox NFL player the only acceptable roster statuses are Active, Practice Squad, or a reserve list (IR, PUP, etc.). If a player is a free agent, just leave it blank.--Rockchalk717 15:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chick Harris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spring Lake Park (Texarkana, Texas) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spring Lake Park (Texarkana, Texas) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring Lake Park (Texarkana, Texas) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Go Phightins! 21:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ryan Longwell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Seattle Seahawks]] ({{NFL Year|2012}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matt Turk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| highschool = Greenfield High School (Greenfield, Wisconsin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evan Gattis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

They were deleted because you were illegally copypasting content to make articles, a blatant copyright violation. Given that this is not the first time I've had problems with you, if I catch you making disruptive edits one more time you're gone from here. Wizardman 15:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bencherlite ^Talk 15:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion at WP:ANI#User:Wizardman, and your failure to listen to previous warnings, you've been blocked indefinitely. Bencherlite ^Talk 15:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elijahadmire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't believe that i infringed copyright. How am i supposed to create a page? it seems damned if i do damned if i don't.

Decline reason:

You quite clearly infringed copyright. You create a page by using your own language, not someone else's. Changing one or two words in a sentence does not change it into original work -- for example, changing In the mid-1930s the settlement had a store and a number of houses; local children attended school at nearby Glover or in Weches to In the 1930's, Burrantown had a store, a few houses, and students went to school in Glover or Weches. I know I would have been flunked if I'd been caught trying to write a school paper that way, and Wikipedia is even stricter. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

well when can i get unblocked? --Elijahadmire (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you can give credible assurance that you will abide by Wikipedia's copyright policy. It would be more credible if you accept an indefinite (but not infinite) ban from creating articles until such time as you can convince the community that you understand copyright. Blackmane (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yall are bullies--Elijahadmire (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it means that Wikipedia is protected from legal violations by editors such as you, then so be it. Blackmane (talk) 04:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chick Harris

The article Chick Harris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

never a head coach; no evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to end block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elijahadmire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Haven't i been blocked long enough??? Elijahadmire (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked until you can convince someone that you understand why you are blocked and will not repeat the problematic behavior. There is no length of time that makes us comfortable with copyright violations. Kuru (talk) 23:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

and how am i supposed to do that?

Blackmane --jpgordon Wizardman

No. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I said it pretty clearly when you were first blocked. My comment still stands. Blackmane (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Marciano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Marciano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Marciano (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Tornado East Texas Never Saw Coming for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Tornado East Texas Never Saw Coming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tornado East Texas Never Saw Coming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]