User talk:Eleventh1

Welcome!

Hello, Eleventh1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mass Hysteria (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mass Hysteria (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mass Hysteria (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there; I saw your note on RHworth's talkpage and went ahead and restored Mass Hysteria (band). If you could add the references you pointed out there to the article, that'd be great; I'm happy to help. Just poke me if you've got any questions or queries. Hopefully this experience didn't disenchant you somewhat, and you decide to stick around! Regards, Ironholds (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mass Hysteria (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mass Hysteria (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass Hysteria (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And ignore the above message as well. Ironholds (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

A discussion with the IP editor who has been trying to force changes to French Resistance has started on Talk:French_Resistance. Since you were also an editor who reverted the former edits of this person as too POV, I thought the discussion may be of interest to you. Cheers, W. B. Wilson (talk) 16:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of French inventions and discoveries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basset (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with Gobind Khorana's identity. This is confirmed at the nobelprize.org website — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.17 (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait five seconds?

I'm glad to see you're adding more information and references to the page, but this comment in the edit summary was completely unnecessary. I have no indication on my end that you will return to add the citation, so I did what anyone should do when a statement is made without a reference. I humbly ask that you refrain from making such comments in the future. Thank you. -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 22:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish Nobel laureates

Sorry to be cryptic. The change is the topic of a Request for Comment on the article talk page. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:List of Jewish Nobel laureates. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eleventh1. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 17:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jayjg ^(talk) 17:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Maj-Britt Nilsson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by Nobel laureates per capita

I've reverted your removal of the AFD tag from this article, which you userfied earlier. User:Colonel Warden reverted the move and questioned the close of the AFD. I, meanwhile, had closed it as Userfied - but since it's no longer userfied, that doesn't apply. Rather than start a new AFD, I reverted my close and annotated the debate. If you wish to explicitly withdraw your nomination, you can do so at the AFD. Sorry for the confusion. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited History of the Jews in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 20 minutes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings

Hi, 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings is not Islamic terrorism, Article 2012 shootings. Why do you add the category again? This is an attack on the individual. Mohammad merah's religion is not important. Terrorism has no place in Islam as well. 15:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emresunay (talk • contribs)

You can propose Category:Islamist terrorism in France for deletion then. Tkuvho (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have twice reverted[1],[2] three separate sourced edits without deigning to discuss this on the Talk page, and then rather incredibly stated, "Don't begin an edit war". While you may disapprove of my conduct, you will find that WP:KETTLE rather accurately describes your editorial behaviour. I am obviously not suggesting you did so in a malicious manner.
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 22:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My deletions were legitimate, your edits were not. And if you really understood WP:KETTLE, you would see the irony here (and you, once again, used a personal attack against a fellow contributor). Eleventh1 (talk) 06:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He not discussing you but yours edits which is perfectly ok--Shrike (talk) 08:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning. You have made three edits [3][4][5] which have removed sources and material from the article. You have not discussed this on the Talk page. Prior to this you have made deletions of entire paragraphs of sourced material [6] without any previous discussion. You removed the source of material throughout the article and then later removed information claiming it was unsourced.[7][8] Please stop your disruptive editing.
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 08:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

I have reported you to ANI
Best Wishes Ankh.Morpork 10:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no exceptions to 3RR here; this is a content dispute. Kuru (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleventh1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I followed the policy that can be seen on WP:3RR : Reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring. To add false information not supported by the sources in an article as was done certainly fall in this category. And beyond that, my last revert of this article was several hours ago. I am modifying another article right now and I don't intend to make any revert on 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings anytime soon. Eleventh1 (talk) 12:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Reverting unsourced or improperly sourced material that you believe is incorrect is not a valid exception to the 3RR rule. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Anti-Semitism in 21st century France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRIF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Table in the article "Funding of Science"

You added a table to the article Funding of science which lists some statistics. There are two problems. The first is that you gave no sources, and the second is that you didn't say what ISR&D stands for. There is a section in the talk page where two people have asked what ISR&D stands for. Also, a google search does come up with an answer. Therefore, I don't think it can be considered obvious what it stands for. Could you list your sources for the statistics and explain what ISR&D stands for? Rectipaedia (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eleventh1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eleventh1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD

Please read WP:BRD and then I invite you to revert your reversion of my reversion. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the error is mine. I didn't spot that sentence being added and made an invalid assumption about the exact timing of it being challenged. Right outcome though, just wrong reason. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eleventh1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Beninese parliamentary election

On 18 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Beninese parliamentary election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 20:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]