User talk:Elep567

Hello, Iammuktisubedi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 01:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Elep567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for making me aware about my mistake on wikipedia platform. I hadn't such intention to make disruptive editing, I wanted to edit the page which has 30/500 protected shield. I am closely connected to that page and the article written over there is just in trollistic manner, and full of negativity about the person and even not proper background information. His residence and other thing are also not changed, although the person wants to change. I had no idea about what to do, even the wikipedia help desk can't able to help directly from there and even in the person talk page the request appeal had been placed by someone connected to him, but yet no reply yet. Then now, someone suggested me to do some sorts of idealistic editing to complete 500 edits fast in wikipedia, and I had already completed second requirement which is 30days. I was unaware about such policy that one cannot edit their own talk page many times. Unintenionally, I made a mistake and I apologize for it and I pledge not to repeat this such behaviour in the days to come. I tried to improve a article including reference, which is not a bad choice either, but due to lack of knowledge of vast policy of wikipedia, I made the mistake. Making this warning as a first and last warning, please give me a chance to rejoin the world largest community wikipedia. And give me a chance to contribute over this platform. The wikipedia page I was trying to edit is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurbaksh_Chahal Iammuktisubedi (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I will give you another chance to make productive contributions. You may find it helpful to use the new user tutorial. If you have any questions, please ask. 331dot (talk) 03:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not against policy to edit your user page multiple times, but it is against policy to make nonsense edits, which is what you did, and you state that you were doing it to get past the 30/500 limitation, which indicates a lack of respect for our policies. That said, what do you intend to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today, I got realised today that Long cuts are always worst to achieve something. Unintentionally, I had gone through wikipedia policy, for that I am really shameful. The condition made me to do such thing, I had to edit the article about the person to improve it, . Due to having a vast policy, I couldn't able to know about the disruptive editing case. I will try to improve the article about Gurbaksh, which I already mentioned above. Beside this I will try to improve some Nepalese article in Wikipedia. I always respect policy and I will do it throughout my life. At last, I again request you to unblock if possible. I always respect your descisions and please let me know if anything need to be done from my side. Iammuktisubedi (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Whitewashing on Gurbaksh Chahal. Lepricavark (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of permissions

Hello, your extended confirmed access has been revoked; it is clear you were gaming the system in order to get access.

Some of your prior non-productive edits may have been deleted or your sandbox reset - this may help you keep track of your legitimate current edits. Per recent precedents these are the methods for you to restore extended-confirmed status:

Avoid making any edits in topics restricted to extended confirmed users, and acquire 500 legitimate other edits; THEN:
Appeal to me on my talk page. Alternately, you may

Apply at WP:PERM/EC

Primefac (talk) 18:49, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for engaging in personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 05:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]