Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Declining this for a couple reasons:
1. The sourcing is almost good enough but the best ones are the Variety articles which count as one source since it's the same publication. NJ.com is a second source, making the page still fall short.
2. The article still needs to be restructured. The "Production and concept" section should be more encyclopedic and less box cover-y, and the "Reception" section should be more balanced.
3. Since the article creator may be Brad Forenza, that needs to be sorted out before it can be accepted anyway. So fixing the above issues might be a moot point.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Around the Sun (audio drama) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Around the Sun (audio drama), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, EleniH8382!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Around the Sun (podcast drama), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Around the Sun (podcast drama) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Around the Sun (podcast drama), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
Draft:Around the Sun (audio drama) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The close-paraphrasing and promotional content has mostly been taken care of, but no new sources have been introduced. The subject's notability is still solely based on NJ.com and Variety. To clearly demonstrate notability, it is often expected that three reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject be provided. It's very possible that the subject simply isn't notable. In which case, the editors of this draft could instead use the two sources they've found and add short bits about Around the Sun to some of the pages of people involved in this project. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Around the Sun (audio drama) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
