User talk:Elena Obradovic

CS1 error on Diplodus annularis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Diplodus annularis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lasius umbratus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page L. flavus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trogulidae

Dear 'Elena Obradovic'. In last days you've made some great edits and improvements on the page Trogulidae. To me, those are part of a group of arthropods that i see long neglected on wiki initiatives. From your wider contributions, your wider interests for wiki seem more diverse, but i wonder if with your help (and others) we can might together focus on fixing those neglected ones related to Trogulidae, so uniting efforts. On the "Trogulidae" page i just added a link to another possible redundant list by another user, but recently i began to edit it further with updates - see List of Dyspnoi species. Point is i'm saying that getting your help focused there could help make a big difference. At this end, i'm a co-author on the catalog that we hope feeds into various downstream initiatives, called "WCO-lite", basically the 'world catalog of Opiliones. I loved that your edits so far were really well justified. Then my thoughs for wiki turn to view that the broad list "Dyspnoi species" which you might have missed - seems more recently updated than on most other pages (for families, genera etc), hence that page might be really good if better linked overview of the whole diversity. Of course, that 'overview listing' could need some updates, but if so i see that could work well being then linked to various sub-pages focused on each genus etc. My main point though, i'm wonder in linking all to such general "overview" list as there might be the better way overall, as revised listings of the species given elsewhere such as your Trogulidae then seem like could be redundant. The main 'overview list' however does fail to detail the geography of each species, so could the locacion of each species be transferred to then use that other as the primary list? [Here - i edit the souce catalog - i have data on the geographic origin of every described species, so we can add country list for all, but i ask that list be once then reflected in multiple pages!]. My thoughts are are each focal taxon page like Trogulidae should only list the genera (plus overview of broader attributes, as you updated) but then any species ONLY IF each matches that other "overview page". Hence, i wish to hear your views. Right now i'm personally looking to get some improvement to the taxonomic hierarchy of these creatures into wikispecies (i.e https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Trogulidae) then that joining wikidata, but if those could then have shared reflection in wikipedia (at least english) then that would be awesome. Sjl197 (talk) 01:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! First of all, thank you for the nice comment. In general, I think that leaving species lists on individual pages is better for the sake of anyone reading about a specific taxon who may not want to look through the whole suborder, but keeping them synced is definitely important. In some other taxa I've seen this organised with invisible comments reminding editors to also edit the larger list if they're editing species lists for lower taxa which would probably be helpful here (and perhaps vice versa if someone is editing the Dyspnoi list). As for including geographic regions I'd say that adding extra information certainly can't hurt. I have no real experience with wikispecies or wikidata yet so I'm of no help there unfortunately. Elena^[^Talk^][^{Contributions]} 15:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of things named after J. R. R. Tolkien and his works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gimli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]