User talk:ElementFire
Well, this is me. I'm not sure about what goes here, I guess I'll have to look at other User Pages to formulate an idea.
The article Nanoroute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Deletion reason 8: lack of notability. This article is about a feature of a software application, which itself does not have its own page, and is not mentioned on the company's page. Mentions of the feature online appear to be limited to brief mentions in academic instruction manuals, or pages from the company's website.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exobiotic 💬 ✒️ 14:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, ElementFire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Threptin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Threptin. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article DJ River, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of DJ River
[edit]Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ River and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- The previous DRV was about the previous closure of the debate. If you want to discuss the deletion outcome, you should start by talking to User talk:Trialsanderrors, who closed it. If that doesn't resolve your questions, you can open a new deletion review at WP:DRV. Keep in mind, DRV is not a second chance: what will mostly be discussed there is the decision by the closer of the debate. Mangojuicetalk 15:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, if you have the time, would you mind elaborating a bit on the article you started: Process corners It took me a bit to realize it was even about making processors, and I think it really lacks context, but I don't know how to write about that topic... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Althena (talk • contribs) 14:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of GoldWave
[edit]Proposed deletion of May's law
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article May's law, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Not notable, no sources; passing mention in David May (computer scientist) is more than enough.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mormegil (talk) 10:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
IEEE technical societies
[edit]If you are a member of one or more of the IEEE technical societies, you may wish to identify yourself as such on Wikipedia. I’ve created Wikipedian categories for each of the 38 IEEE technical societies. The new Template:User IEEE member creates a userbox identifying the society and your membership grade and includes your user page in the relevant Wikipedian category. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note. Yours aye, Buaidh 18:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC) — IEEE Life Member
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)