User talk:ElectricXplorer

Speedy deletion nomination of England is not China

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as England is not China, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 18:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at England is not China, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Home Lander (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:England is not China

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:England is not China, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete my pages for no reason

Please do not delete my pages because they are attack pages. They are not and i am just a guy trying to help people less fortunate than I understand simple concepts. Isn't it the whole point of an encyclopedia to inform? ElectricXplorer (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal To Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElectricXplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no way for my edits to be disrupting anyone, i was merely trying to inform people (as i have said on my talk page) less fortunate then I of simple concepts and if an Admin of an Encyclopedia does not like people informing others then i do wonder about how you became an Admin ElectricXplorer (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Fully justified block. Just Chilling (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ElectricXplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17459 was submitted on Feb 04, 2017 19:02:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]