User talk:ElectricTurahk

This user may have left Wikipedia. ElectricTurahk has not edited Wikipedia since 31 January 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Re: Dome vs. Cavern

I used the word "cavern" in describing the Pit because I felt it was a quick and easy way to explain to newcomers that it was underground, as opposed to being an above-ground structure. By stating upfront that it was underground, not as much time would have to be spent explaining how it could reasonably be flooded by the sea. "Dome" and "cavern" are both legitimate descriptions of the Pit, and while the first is more commonly used I felt the second was more descriptive in this case (and I did keep the word "dome" when it was used in the following paragraph). Drakhan 06:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BoM Mutants

I removed the mutant Rahi from the BoM article because I didn't think they were notable, especially as Greg stated the BoM created almost all Rahi to begin with. Half of them (Kinloka, Rahkshi-Headed Serpent, Tarakava Nui, and Vatuka) were already covered in the Rahi article; and the rest were just wierd beasts for the Toa Metru to encounter as opposed to parts of big Brotherhood plots. I wouldn't mind if notes were made in the Rahi article (like adding a sentence under Tarakava: "A two-headed specimen was found and placed deep in the Archives" or something like that) but I don't think that the BoM article is quite the right place for that info. If you really think it does belong there, we can talk it over. Drakhan 23:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toa Mario

I'd recommend you ignore him. He's obviously created multiple sockpuppets to evade his block and push his point of view on the Collis Potter Huntington article. Even if he's doing it from a different IP address, its still sockpuppetry. He's been abusive and is clearly intend on damaging Wikipedia. Gwernol 19:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraxon Image

Greetings, ET. I think that the OoMN page should have a pic of Hydraxon in it by now, and I'm not very good with images. So if you have any experience with pics, do you think you could (legally) track down a pic of him for the page? I'm well aware that you might not be able to, but just in case I figured it might be a good idea to see if you could. ( And on a side note, I removed that image of the Toa Mahri because it doesn't have a copyright tag.) -- -- Gravitan 17:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't until you said the "legally" that I grew concerned. I know exactly how to update images; I've done it plenty of times on BS01. Though they aren't strict there with iamge policy. I've uploaded one now (see Image:OoMNHydraxon.jpg), but I don't know any of the copyright info that should be there... ElectricTurahk 20:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splendid, thanks ET. Though I'm not sure what we should do about the copyright info; you might try asking Drakhan, I think he would probably know. And thanks again for your help with that. :) -- -- Gravitan 21:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this is from Lego Shop at Home (or at least, some other commercial site)? The first thing you'll need is a "promotional" tag, identifying the picture as being freely distributed to promote a product. All you have to type is {promotional} (though with two sets of curly brackets instead of one). Then put a link to the site where you found the image, and add a standard copyright line noting who the character legally belongs to - just copy and paste this: "© 2007 The LEGO Group. All rights reserved." Drakhan 00:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bionicle

Hi -- just to let you know I removed your FA nomination of "Bionicle" from the Herne Bay nomination where you placed it. There were two problems -- first, it shouldn't go inside another nomination; it needs to use the featured article candidates template. Second, it should go at the top of the list.

I could add it back for you, but you might prefer to do so yourself, so I haven't done so yet. (Aside from anything else, Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations gives credit to the nominator, so you should get the credit.) The instructions are at the top of WP:FAC, and are fairly straightforward. Let me know if you have any trouble, or ask at WT:FAC if you prefer. Hope that helps. Mike Christie (talk) 11:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use gallery

See Talk:Toa. Continuing to violate the nonfree images policy in this manner may lead to a block, and that would be bad - David Gerard 21:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've also just broken WP:3RR. Please take care not to - David Gerard 21:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like to know

I would like to know why you keep taking the pictures away on the article called toa. tell me why on my talk page.Swirlex 21:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BL#7

Greetings, ET. I think it would be wise to just let alone the BL#7 spoilers; Drakhan says that it would be best that way. If somebody removes the spoiler tags regarding that book, just let them be. As you probably know, I tried using future tags, but that didn't get anywhere, seeing as BL#7 is already out. The condition of the Bionicle pages these days is just plain depressing. We've had all of our spoiler tags and a lot of our images removed. But I really don't understand why they have to pick on us all of a sudden. Anyway, as I said, we should just give up on this whole spoiler thing; we are vastly outnumbered. -- -- Gravitan 11:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on; I think we might have something here. On this page. If we can play this right, then we might just be able to get the tags back. -- -- Gravitan 11:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BS01

Well, Shine thought that the other one was better for some reason. I'll see what I can do about it. -- -- Gravitan 17:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

You're very welcome ^^ I'm starting to believe this is a hostile takeover by a small group who happened to remove an amazing 45,000 tags then claim that they have the consensus. Kuronue 00:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! I suspect they managed to catch the majority of editors sleeping and blindside them. Who actually pays attention to the spoiler guidelines until someone tells them they did it wrong? It's pretty much assumed it hasn't changed because who bothers to check? then they wake up one day and notice "oh, removed per WP:SPOIL? huh, musta changed the guideline" and then go back to bed. Kuronue 02:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gnangarra

Please leave other editors comments on my talk page if they arent hostile and very uncivil, I've been around long enough now to be able to judge when another editor isnt WP:AGF. If you'd like to send me an email about the other editor please do. Gnan garra 01:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language

ElectricTurahk, in many of your posts I've been noticing a tone of general disrespect towards others, sometimes including foul language. Please keep in mind that even if they disagree with us on things; we are trying to work with them, not against them. They're not trying to make life difficult for us, they're just trying to follow the rules and (particularly in the case of the pictures) keep their butts covered legally, and we need to respect that. Drakhan 18:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. On a friendlier note, I followed the Neopets link in your bio and saw that you're a Krawk Island supporter in the Altador Cup. I'm backing Darigan, and look forward to the grudge match.

Real information

What i edited on the visorak wikipedia page is real information it even says it in the book bionicle Rahi encyclopedia. It is real.Swirlex 22:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reward

Hey ElectricTurahk,
Nice tab trick. Here's your reward. User:Selfworm/HiddenLinkAward Congratulations! selfworm^Talk) 02:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warriors

Great job on the warriors page! I'm glad you went ahead and that you were bold abut it, so without further ado...

		The Original Barnstar
		Great job on being bold and doing a huge project! Well done! ~Crowstar~ 13:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brackenfur

Looks like we had a bit of work overlap going on. The article was an orphan when I found it, with nothing linking to it. So I did a search and created the appropriate links. At the same time it was turned into a redirect. And so it goes. Thanks for the heads up! -- MisterHand 21:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: warning

sorry. I didnt know putting that sentence on was going to be vandalism. people do compare carapar's name with crapper, I was just putting that fact on.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyuuga-sama (talk • contribs)

Sorry about that last message

I clicked the wrong name and thought I was warning a vandal. My bad :-)

Cheers, —Curran _{(talk | contibs | random)} 17:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Dude

Lol, no, I'm not stalking you. I just have this habit of checking people's contributions, which leads me to certain pages which I don't know much about. I find that you're very useful for finding places to leave warnings. :P I just love those templates... And I editied that page 'cause I thought I saw a misplaced period. And I was also really really bored. :P Last night, you even beat me to reverting those "Book mistake" edits by that IP. I don't know anything about Warriors, but I do know what makes an article tick. So anyway, I jus' check your contribs once in a while for anything interesting. Let me know if you'd like me to stop; wouldn't want to make ya feel like you really are being stalked. It's just that my WikiJe... On second thought, better not get into that right now. :P -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Block

I'm not happy with blocking those IPs - they looks like they're fairly dynamic. In other words, the user's IP seems to change regularly and there's no guarantee he'll go back to using an IP he's used before (but it may affect legitimate future users who "inherit" the IP address). Instead, I would be willing to semi-protect your userpage so that IPs and new accounts cannot edit it. Let me know if you'd like me to do that. WjBscribe 17:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Can you tell me why every bionicle picture is being takin away all of a sudden?Swirlex 00:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the admins are a bit strange I see and understand why the images are being taken away.Swirlex 01:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EletricTurahk, I saw this and wanted to take the opportunity to comment.
Many companies produce imagery for various marketing campaigns. Simply because these images are part of advertising does not in any way mean they are in the public domain. Creators of original works have copyrights to the works they create. Even if they display the work, reproduce it, or distribute it they can and almost always do maintain their rights to the work. Else, the first time people sold a product they'd lose all rights to it and everyone would be free to copy it without cost.
As an aside, public domain images do not have to be used under terms of fair use. Fair use is a legal term in the United States, similar to the fair dealing concept in many other countries. It applies only to copyrighted works, and never to public domain works.
Wikipedia strives to have only free content. That means copyrighted content is discouraged in favor of free content. Even if the free content is of lesser quality, the free content will always be used. You might find this stupid, or any other negative word you wish to associate with that philosophy. However, this is a core philosophy of Wikipedia and will not change. We are a free content encyclopedia, and that will remain the case forever.
I hope this helps to explain. If you'd like assistance in understanding this further, please feel free to ask. Thanks, --Durin 14:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BS01

The BS01 is back up. Go see for yourself. Gonna need some help over there. -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sort of. -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's kinda how I feel. Probably best to just wait and see if they really did have things backed up. But if they didn't... -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, better to wait for an answer. But I hope that they have the pages saved. And the images. And the coding. And the settings... *sigh* -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 13:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Profanity

What's up with this edit summary? I restored your wording. It was Supernerd 10 who replaced the "nasty words". ;) I even left a note on his talk page about it. -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuses, excuses. :P I can see why you were confused. And you did the right thing. Users aren't supposed to edit other users' comments unless the comments happen to be blatent spam or vandalism. Yours wasn't. -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:DarkRiver.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:DarkRiver.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Bioconvoy

Whatever you say. He was kinda freakin' me out there. :P -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Into the Wild (Warriors)

User:Metros has done this. I would understand and wholeheartedly agree with the edit if it were not for the fact that I had made the same edit and you said you had the proof that Rusty was the cat on the cover. If that proof could be put on the talk page or something just so we can keep that description in the article that would be great. Bella Swan_(Talk!) 23:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving?

Why are you leaving? Crowstar^{Vaseline-on-the-lens-Jitsu!fwends!} 11:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sloe

I saw this edit summary. A Sloe is a blackthorn. I seriously don't know why they gave that name, because 85% of the readers wouldn't know what it was. Crowstar^{Vaseline-on-the-lens-Jitsu!fwends!} 19:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I think it should be more like 99% of readers. Thanks for tellin' me, by the way. I actually didn't even think of looking that up. XD --~|ET|~(^{Talk|Contribs}) 19:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have A Nice Day

Grav has given you a squid! Squids somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! -- Gravitan^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Hello!

You asked if anyone could translate the following: dorka ukko säkin oot Vittu säkin oot vaan yksi saatann tyhmä pelle ja luulet olevas jotain suurtaki, which is indeed Finnish slang of Helsinki region. The wording is somewhat unnatural, the clause has no punctuation and even as a straightforward transcription of the spoken Finnish, it includes a typo (saatann pro 'saatanan).

The literal translation is: "A stupid man, you are, too! Fuck! You are, too, just one of Satan's stupid clown and you think you're something big." A better translation would carry the meaning more completely.

Please do not consider this posting an insult. --MPorciusCato 18:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Out of curiosity, why is your userpage protected?--Supernerd 10 21:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility on List of ThunderClan Cats

Hi, ET. I know that you are highly involved in the "The Warriors" project, but it is (IMO) not at all civil to leave, as an edit summary, "HELL FUCKING NO! Nowhere was this discussed. THINGS STAY AS IS. It's more organized this way anyways." Please don't bite someone for trying to be bold and fix an article whose scope has (again, IMO) gotten completely out of control. I've tried to encourage paring down the article through the in-universe tag, but I was quickly flooded with people accusing me of closed-mindedness and ignorance before the discussion ended without consequence and the tag removed. Either way, User:Minesweeper.007 seemed to be acting in good faith and should not be confronted with incivility for trying to improve the project. Thank you for your time, bwowen talk•contribs 23:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I already apologized to him for that. Yes, it was uncalled for, and I realize that - I acted without proper reasoning. And though, yes, he was bold, such a large move was not discussed at all, and I viewed it as an unnecessary change (I thought of it as similar to splitting the Akatsuki (Naruto) page into the original page and the members page... In the end, the pages were remerged. They were just better off on one page, in my opinion. And I vew that as being the same way here - for the Clans, page that is. Obviously, the character pages are a tad different, but to organize them by series would create a massive list.)

And, by the way, I've been thinking about that whole in-universe thing. Now, I think you're write in some respects... Methinks you (or we) should try again to fix it up a bit... With some civil discussion, of course. --~|ET|~(^{Talk|Contribs}) 23:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ET. It was my mistake for not checking Mine's talk page before commenting on you, and for that I apologize - all I saw was the edit summary and I, like you, reacted strongly. Anywho, I'm glad that you're up for having another look at the article and trying to pare it down to a more manageable size. Check out WP:WAF, and I'll start a discussion again on the talk page. Thanks again for your passion for the project - just remember to try to stay cool! =] Best wishes, bwowen talk•contribs 01:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Warriors

We did talk about it several months ago, I just now got around to cleaning it up. I'm sorry for not alerting anyone as to my intentions. I also thought that a page that was over 200 something Kilobytes was a little long so I was shortening it. I deserved the rebuke for moving mass sections of the article without community discussion. TTYL, Minesweeper.007 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warriors Covers

Nice work on the covers, but how long will it stay before A CERTAIN SOMEONE reverts it? only time will tell... ^DAVID _CAT 22:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SURPRISE!

Bella Swan has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Quote

Nice ET I can so picture that. The name removed person is so funny in that scene. Great Being 1 03:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote what

Try here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Hunter ClawClaw 20:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know a good source just give me a second to try and find it... ClawClaw 20:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here: http://www.theguttersnipe.co.uk/ if you go to FAQs under Warriors one of the questions asks her which books she wrote. You can find out the ones Cherith wrote are all the ones Kate mentioned. I know thta' original research but I'm sure there's someplace somewhere that states which books Cherith wrote in case someone decides to get angry 0_o ClawClaw 20:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SkyClan Characters

If you consider Cherrytail a main character why not Sparrowpelt? They are siblings and were in the book at the same time. If you can give me a good reason why he is not and that's not just your opinion then you can switch him back to Secondary characters but just because he doesn't 'feel' like a main character isn't good enough. ClawClaw 16:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Protection Question

To remove individual edit links (section editing), use __NOEDITSECTION__. It's a magic word. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will You?

I noticed you have been involved with a lot of Warrior Cats projects, and was wondering: Would you like to join the Warriors Wikia? Let me know at my talk page(Eulalia459678) on The Warriors Wiki. Thank you SO much for your time!
Eulalia459678 of the WarriorsWiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.1.217.113 (talk) 20:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WarriorsWiki

Thanks for replying, and I hope you help out! Eulalia459678 (Thats pronounced you-lay-lee-ahh, with a nice long ahhhhh) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.1.217.113 (talk) 21:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I only put how it was pronounced because it is one of my favorite Redwall quotes. My favorite Warriors quote is from Graystripe: "Well I stalk like a lopsided badger! I'll have to find a stupid mouse and sit on it until it lets me catch it." Followed by Yellowfang stating about Runningnose: "He became medicine cat? He can't even cure his onw cold!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.1.217.113 (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Eclipse (Warriors)

The article was not acceptable for speedy deletion as it asserts notability per WP:CSD#A7. Admitedly it probably fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR but these are not acceptable reasons to speedy delete. I'd take it to WP:AFD if I were you. Let me know if you want any help on that. Pedro : Chat 10:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility warning

This is in response to your message at User talk:Pilotbob#Clan (Warriors). Remember to remain civil and assume good faith at all times. Do not say that someone belongs to a "kind of people that make Wikipedia a bad site in the eyes of fans of anything", and never ever insinuate that a fellow editor is "a complete and utter bullshitting asshole". A ecis^Brievenbus 00:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cats of the Clans

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Cats of the Clans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Metros 10:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is no different from the one you nominated for deletion and which was subsequently deleted a week or so back. Metros 10:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Maxilos_and_Spinax.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Maxilos_and_Spinax.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:OoMNHydraxon.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:OoMNHydraxon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DarkRiver.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DarkRiver.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Warriors Role Call

Hi. You have listed youself as an active contributor of WikiProject Warriors, but as we are trying to see who is still active, we have put all names under "Possibly Inactive." If you are still active, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Warriors and move your name to "Active." Move your name to "Inactive" if you no longer wish to contribute. You may always move it back. See the talk page after moving your name to "Active" to see some ideas on what to do. Thank you!

Shrewpelt (talk) 21:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Toa Inika/Toa Mahri

An editor has nominated Toa Inika/Toa Mahri, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toa Inika/Toa Mahri and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Toa

An editor has nominated Toa, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toa (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fire and Ice (Warriors)

An editor has nominated Fire and Ice (Warriors), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire and Ice (Warriors) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rahi (Bionicle)

An editor has nominated Rahi (Bionicle), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahi (Bionicle) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language

What the hell! God dammit, I'm not gonna go help there. If they lost everything, bah. Swert said they were backing things up. --~|ET|~

E.T. I didn't think you used such language. -Kazi22 _Talk 22 March 2008

:O ET, those are some strong words. o_O -Danwojo812 - My Talk

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary

Hi! Since you're listed as a Wikipedian in Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]