User talk:ElectricRay

Agree = it's a bad example. If the doll actually sold for 5500, it is hard to justify a market cost of the doll at 6000, and if you did do that (ie that was the replacement cost to the purchaser) then his "profit" trade is now a five hundred bucks loss!, so rather than adding to his damages, they would detract from it, seeing as the plaintiff has admitted the most he expected to make out of the trade was 500 bucks. Works much better if the trade to the COllector is at MORE than the replacement cost - say $6500, not $5500.
Analysis is this - assuming the doll is a fungible commodity:
- Contract stipulates a doll having characteristics XYX must be delivered. Contractual damages are the cost of putting P in the position he'd have been in had D performed as promised, i.e. the actual "replacement cost" of buying a doll XYZ elsewhere minus the £5000 that P had agreed to pay for it. Let's say the replacement cost was $6000: The damages are $1000.
- Now two things can happen:
  - (I) Collector C has a binding contract with P to purchase a doll at $6500 which P risks breaching (because he hasn't got a doll from D).
    - P buys the doll on the market for $6000 and delivers the doll to C at $6500.
    - Instead of being up $1500 ($6500 - $5000) as he expected, P is only up $500 (ie $6500 - $6000).
    - Therefore P's total loss is still only $1000. There are no consequential damages - the ordinary damages claim gets you where you need to be.
  - (II) Collector C does not have a binding contract with P and walks away from P (because he bought the doll directly from D).
    - In this case D's action (selling the doll directly to C) is NOT a breach of P's contract (no-one said he couldn't sell an XYZ doll to someone else - they're fungible remember), so we are left with the contractual damages claim of $1000.
- The consequential damages claim is that D wrongfully (& in breach of contract) caused P to miss the opportunity to sell to the Collector. Unless the doll was a unique artifact, I don't think you can make out that claim.
If the doll is unique
You could argue that selling that doll to someone else is a direct breach of contract. Effectively it wasn't P's doll to sell

Archived Material

Finchley Common

Im glad to see someone has had a go at this, I've meant to for so long. I'm going to make a few amendments, hope you don't mind. Hugh Petrie

I've placed a revision of the article on the discussion page of the Finchley Common article. Any feed back? If I get none in the next two weeks I will take it as read. Hugh

Hatfield Forest

I'll gladly restore it, if you were planning on working on it further? --Merovingian - Talk 07:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the article has been restored. Happy editing! :) --Merovingian - Talk 15:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. --Merovingian - Talk 16:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All Blacks

I am aware that the team are called the All Blacks. I left the page alone without moving it for over two years whilst still being a major contributor to the page. If, however, there is going to be avote on what the page should be called, my vote is for New Zealand national rugby union team.

I have yet to see a scoreboard with 'All Blacks' written on it nor are New Zealand referred to as the All Blacks in official fixture lists in tournaments such as the World Cup.GordyB 13:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you read the talk page of the All Blacks. GordyB 19:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sociology vs Law

Thanks for your comment - I get what you're saying but it still doesn't really work for me. I'm not a student of sociology, but I can't see the interactions of governments and of political units of Maori as a sociological phenomenon - Treaty politics was historically about the exercise of legal and military power. Sociological phenomena fuelled the interactions - depopulation, breakdown of traditional kinship groups, massive Pakeha immigration and so on. And again, post war Maori urbanisation brought the education and population growth to enable the Maori renaissance and generate the political will to do something about Treaty stuff. But it's leadership to leadership, not a grassroots thing. I think we're coming at it from quite different angles. --Tirana 08:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Trivia" sections

ElectricRay, you recently removed the Trivia section from the page discussing Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, and relocated it at its own page. You may be interested in reading the comments I've left on the talk page elaborating why I think the two pages should be (re)merged. --Todeswalzer|Talk 18:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Sampson

Hi I have just created an article entitled Geoffrey Sampson, and note that you deleted one with this title in May 2006. My Wikipedia skills are not such that I could determine the reasons for deletion (I couldn't find the discussion). The chap seems easily notable enough for inclusion (he is already referred to in several other mainspace articles), but if I'm missing something, please let me know. Regards ElectricRay 10:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The version I deleted was comprised of nothing other than "Geoffrey Sampson is a big stinky poo face", so I think we can safely assume your version is somewhat better. :D Looks great, and keep up the good work. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 12:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pinker

Please see my user talk page for my response. ThAtSo 20:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded again. ThAtSo 23:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cultural References to Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil

Cultural References to Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Cultural References to Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural References to Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Cultural References to Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 17:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Marduk in popular culture

Marduk in popular culture, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Marduk in popular culture satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marduk in popular culture (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Marduk in popular culture during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 18:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Eyrian

Thank you for your comments there. Bearian 16:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ElectricRay/Eulogy

Speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Martin Davies (Author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. jj137 (Talk) 23:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake! If I was going to tag it with speedy it should have been for little or no context and not "importance". In that case I should have just labeled it as a stub, and not a speedy. It definitely has enough importance; thanks for the notice. jj137 (Talk) 00:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem- it was a mistake that needed clarifying. jj137 (Talk) 00:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creovation

And under 1000 Google hits is impressive because? JuJube (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you disagree with the deletion, I'm not the person to go to. Take it to WP:DRV, preferably with something more impressive than a Google search. JuJube (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Martin Lukes: Who Moved My BlackBerry™

A tag has been placed on Martin Lukes: Who Moved My BlackBerry™, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dougie WII (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:051210 Political Compass.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:051210 Political Compass.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 19:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello ElectricRay! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Martin Davies (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Philip Augar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nick Moore (Film Director)

The article Nick Moore (Film Director) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

citations

not every tiny fact on this wiki needs to be, or is, cited. Not going to get into an edit war on it; just sayin'. ElectricRay (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but big juicy opinions about sexual fetishism *do* need a citation, otherwise it's still just original research. - JeffJonez (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew Jacobs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard Rose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reply about silly point

Hello Ray,

The naming of these particular close catching positions may not make sense when compared to where an orthodox square leg or point would stand, but if you asked any cricketer, professional or amateur, what these two positions are they would say silly point and short leg. Its a matter of convention rather than logic.

Silly mid off and silly mid on tend to be straighter and further away from the bat - about half way up the pitch, and a few feet either side. Wider of them would be short cover and short midwicket, the positions you describe would be denoted as short point and short square leg. Py0alb (talk) 09:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok - but you should know I *am* an amateur cricketer!!! ElectricRay (talk) 13:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited There is a Tavern in the Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William H. Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Coldfall Wood South Entrance.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Coldall Wood Blasted Oak.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Coldfall Wood Hornbeam Undercanopy.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilt-edged securities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMO. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ElectricRay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ElectricRay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Here's Looking at You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ElectricRay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]