User talk:Electiondata

New message from DBigXray

Hello, Electiondata. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 05:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DBig Xrayᗙ 05:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WhatsApp snooping scandal

Dear Electiondata, many thanks for your new article. I noticed that this topic is already covered to a greater extent in the WhatsApp main article and therefore appears to duplicate the topic. I have therefore placed a redirect to the relevant section of the WhatsApp article. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sprinklr deal controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sprinklr deal controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprinklr deal controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akshay Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akshay Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshay Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bilby (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Electiondata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Bilby Hello I'm not a sock puppet of Barkaat Ahmad. Have you done a SPI on us?. Please do a SPI on us and unblock me. Electiondata (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There does not have to be a formal SPI to determine that there is sockpuppetry. If you aren't connected to the other account, you will need to tell us why, a simple denial is not enough. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of WhatsApp snooping scandal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WhatsApp snooping scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WhatsApp snooping scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]