User talk:ElbowRite

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Malik Siraj Akbar.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Malik Siraj Akbar.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheila Crowley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheila Crowley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Crowley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sheila Crowley— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Low Income Housing Coalition with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dcirovic (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Low Income Housing Coalition

The article National Low Income Housing Coalition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page's creator just blanked the page, as seen here with the edit summary "(I am taking down the page I created)". The page has had multiple issues since it was created, is about an organization barely notable, and the same editor created an article about this agency's head, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Crowley, which was just deleted. As the article's creator, and editor who made 14/20 edits on the page in just over two weeks, wants to delete the page, I anticipate no opposition to the removal of this article under "PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JesseRafe (talk) 15:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malik Siraj Akbar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik Siraj Akbar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Siraj Akbar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]