User talk:Elad189

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:IronGargoyle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 11:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you need to speak urgently, you can email me on Ryanpostlethwaite

hotmail.com . Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 11:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prof. Jacob Sheskin

The article Prof. Jacob Sheskin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Claims of notability are unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Prof. Jacob Sheskin, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Prof. Jacob Sheskin was changed by Elad189 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-07-27T12:34:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Looks like you are trying to cite sources there but are having some problems. Take a look at WP:CITE and WP:FOOTNOTE for tips.--RadioFan (talk) 12:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Prof. Jacob Sheskin, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sheskin (disambiguation)

The article Sheskin (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page, only one possible candidate article, disambiguation should be used when there are many possible destinations

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?

I haven't deleted any page called "Sheskin". If you mean the disambig. Then reading the history will show you:

23:25, 25 August 2009 DragonflySixtyseven (talk | contribs) deleted "Sheskin (disambiguation)" (superfluous)
13:02, 27 July 2009 The JPS (talk | contribs) deleted "Sheskin (disambiguation)" (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion)

I proposed it for deletion and an admin deleted it. If your think there should be a disambig, please talk to the admins who deleted. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said talk to the delting admins as listed above. please don't post enormous jpgs on my talk page. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Firstly, thank you for caring re: my loss.

Secondly, a disambiguation page (that is, one with 'disambiguation' in its name) is not necessary unless there are multiple meanings. I suggest that you read the disambiguation guidelines.

This is not to say that your concerns were misplaced, only that your attempt to resolve them was incorrect. The article on the Irish locality now has a pointer directly to the article on ~~the Israeli physician~~ your grandfather, which is what it should have had in the first place. DS (talk) 13:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some ways you could improve the article: where and when was your grandfather born? I hope he is still alive... if not, where and when did he pass on? Do you perhaps have a photo of him with fewer people crowded around him? DS (talk) 14:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]