User talk:El benito

Welcome!

Hello, El benito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 22:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

Hey, my favorite character lately has been Genis-vell so I've been updating a lot. I noticed you did a couple of basic changes (one was spelling, the other fixed a link). PLEASE give a quick summary when ya do a change, and tag it as a small fix if it's something like that. Otherwise I get nervous about my baby (even though I didn't write the article, lol). Thanks. --Torourkeus 21:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Randall McCloy

I know this out of left field, but you were involved with some discussion on this article and the guy who keeps inserting his "expert" testimony is back and I could use some help in responding to him. J Shultz 06:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Echoing

That's no problem at all. Err, I guess I think mine is more concise, but that's probably only because I wrote it. I'm certainly not about to delete anyone else's work. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 16:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crimson Dawn

Because each article, ideally, should have references and in line citations so people know where the information came from. People won't assume that the article came from external links. It seems like a good article, but I am labelling it to be improved in that way. The more references, especially those cited in articles makes it better. :) Judgesurreal777 17:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avengers members template

I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to say. Why would the names of the Avengers on the templates need changing? Kusonaga 00:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tha's cool, no need to apologize. :) Kusonaga 10:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vibraxas

I still don't think there's a lot to say about Vibraxas or that he is a particularly notable character (besides Fantastic Force and the latter third of Christopher Priest's Black Panther, he's pretty much not done anything else in the Marvel Universe), but if you want to start the article, go ahead; it's up to you. I didn't "kill" any Vibraxas article; no article existed at the time, and I created a redirect, which is better than nothing at all. —Lowellian (reply) 06:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skeets

Wow. Good catch on 52 Week Six. All of the arrows point at both Booster and Skeets. --Chris Griswold (☏) 18:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note about wiki.png change

Hi, I was just taking a look at wiki.png and I noted that yours was the last edit of the file. I understand that you made some type of graphical change to it, but at the same time, the filesize just about doubled. It's still a relatively small file, and I'm sure that the picture itself is cached all over the internet, but it is on every page so it's bound to be downloaded an insane number of times. I've no clue as how to weigh aesthetics vs economics, especially given I don't know what the bandwidth issues are, but I thought I'd just bring this to your attention. Thanks! El benito 22:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi El benito: don't worry, the image at Wiki.png is not enabled to be the sitewide logo. You need a developer to change the logo here. I asked Tim Starling about changing it, but he raised the same concern as you: file size. —Mets501 (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Heroes4hire.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Heroes4hire.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2099 Unlimited Jan3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:2099 Unlimited Jan3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Phil Sandifer 17:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brute edit

I like the move to Brute (Hank McCoy). I'm going to redirect Brute (Marvel Comics) to the Brute (comics) page in order to avoid having two disambig pages. -- 69.183.15.244 06:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eternals vol 1 issue 5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eternals vol 1 issue 5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phaeder

The article Phaeder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable character with only primary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Killer Moff (talk) 16:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ship (comics)

The article Ship (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional entity that fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. BEFORE does not show any analysis, only in-universe style summaries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]