User talk:Ekraus

Hello and welcome! Your unsourced edits or poorly sourced edits to Mikhail Khodorkovsky and other articles are unhelpful and will be reverted as per WP:BLP. If you persist, and fail to discuss with other editors on the article talk page, your actions will be reported. - BorisG (talk) 10:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Khodorkovsky postings

The postings about Khodorkovsky, a convicted criminal under Russian law, are tendentious and unbalanced. There are two sides to the argument - people friends to the convicted oligarch have been allowed to present theirs, while those critical of him have been systematically deleted. Anyone working in Russia in the 1990s, as I did, will know exactly who the oligarchs were, and what they did to the country. Khodorkovsky was one of them - indeed, one of the worst.

This is not political diatribe. It is simply a question of censorship. Khodorkovsky is credibly accused of being involved in the murder of Yukos opponents, including in the pages of the New York Times and the Financial Times, and the Wikipedia should be more balanced.

I look forward to discussion. Eric Kraus (username ekraus) Ekraus (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Khakamada

I wonder if the editorial remarks you added to the article reflect an uncontested view. The remarks seem to argue with a point of view that did not belong in editorial remarks either. If you think the referenced statements in the allegation section do not hold water, add references to refuting or positive statements. Cheers. --ilgiz (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]