User talk:Ekram baig
Leverage Edu moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Leverage Edu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs tp meet the standard WP:NCOEP. requiring references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. Almost all the refeeences here are mere announcement of funding or just incidental notices. . I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Iff you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
co
[edit]Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in exactly the format of a press release, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. DGG ( talk ) 11:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
@DGG: I really appreciate you taking out the time to review Leverage Edu. If you see the contribution history, I've edited several articles before creating Leverage Edu and have no connections with any of those companies. I read several articles on Wikipedia before contributing my first article to Wikipedia to make sure I do things correctly. I joined Wikipedia not so long ago and accept the fact that I may make mistakes and there is a lot to learn. I would be very grateful to you if you help me identify those issues so I could correct them, this would help me improve and contribute quality articles to Wikipedia.
@DGG: I've removed the promotional and unverified content. The article now looks fine. I understand you must be busy, i would be so grateful to you if you take out few minutes of your precious time to review Draft:Leverage Edu. Thanks a lot.
@DGG: I have made significant changes to the page including edits that removed promotional jargon and unreliable sources. I read through all of the various guidelines dealing with notability, the subject does meet the Wikipedia's (WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV). The updated post is neutral and provides useful information about the organization. Since you are not responding so i will just go ahead and move Draft:Leverage Edu to main space.
March 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=I see you have blocked me from editing Wikipedia pages. Did i violate any of the policies? I joined Wikipedia not so long ago and understand that I may make mistakes. I am still learning seeing other articles. I really need you to bring the issues you encounter to my notice so I could improve and contriute some quality articles to Wikipedia, requesting you to unblock me.}}. MER-C 13:51, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Leverage Edu
[edit]
Hello, Ekram baig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leverage Edu".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)