User talk:Ekin

— Ekin^(talk·@) 11:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stereomcsconnected.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stereomcsconnected.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cd Koop Sons of Koop.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cd Koop Sons of Koop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Happymondaysyesplease.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Happymondaysyesplease.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain this edit

What country is that television station located in? Also, what tv station is it? If you click the link (TRT), it leads to a disambiguation page. Please clarify, thanks. →Ed Gl 14:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a blog or social networking site

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Sissyneck may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Ha69ard may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 16:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me repeat this, as you, User:Sissyneck, and (the probably non-existent) User:Ha69ard do not seem to have understood yet: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog, social networking site, or substitute for MySpace or Facebook. If you're here to contribute to the building of an encyclopedia, fine; if your primary purpose is fooling around with your and each others' user pages and leaving each other messages, no: user pages are a way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Please remember this.

P.S.: Based on edit], a read of this may prove useful--Calton | Talk 15:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mondaysyesplease.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mondaysyesplease.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Krumping.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Krumping.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stereomcsconnected.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stereomcsconnected.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arifsusam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arifsusam.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Docmanhattan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Docmanhattan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Userhaggard.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Userhaggard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 17:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:12247849541307080526radacina cursor hand.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:12247849541307080526radacina cursor hand.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 01:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Cup

Greetings,

I can understand about Istanbul BB to distinguish it from another club. So, thank you for explaining that to me. But I feel that that does not apply to Beşiktaş. Just because it is also the name of a town, does not mean you have to keep the "J.K." all the time. We (football editors) don't put always have to put Liverpool F.C., A.C. Milan, or FC Barcelona, for example, when it is specifically clear it is about the club. You can pipe it so it says Liverpool, Milan, or Barcelona. It's actually preferred policy for the wikiproject on football. I also did not take too well to a complete reversion of my edits when the acronyms are your main (only?) concern. The flags did not have to be there, but you reverted my removal of those. Next time, be careful reverting an entire edit when you only have a problem with part of it. Unless it is an international competitions, the flags do not have to be there. Thanks. Digirami (talk) 21:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Glad it was resolved rather quickly, too. Cheers! Digirami (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons usurpation request

I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is Kemalaysel. — Ekin^(talk·@) 07:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Wikipedia account takeover

I would like to take over Ekin on Simple Wikipedia and I use my old account Kemalaysel there. This is an edit to prove that I hold the SUL to the Ekin username. — Ekin^(talk·@) 07:24, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

This edit is to confirm that I, user Ekin, have control over the SUL account. — Ekin^(talk·@) 11:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 12:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

German Wikipedia usurpation request

Hello, I confirm that I'd like to usurp de:User:Ekin. — Ekin^(talk·@) 11:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of remaining usurpations

~~commons~~ → Done — Ekin^(talk·@) 07:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~bs.wiki~~ → Done --CER@ (??ask??) 06:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~hu.wiki~~ → Done
~~id.wiki~~ → Done
~~ja.wiki~~ → Done ja:User:Ekin --Kanjy (talk) 11:12, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~ms.wiki~~ → Done
~~pl.wiki~~ → Done
~~ro.wiki~~ → Done
~~zh.wiki~~ → Done

Besiktas

OK I'm sorry, I'll do better my best next time. You to have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samessi (talk • contribs) 15:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samessi (talk • contribs) 15:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Bim'den aldıydım.. sissyneck (talk) 11:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umut Kaya

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Umut Kaya. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect skid mark illustration

Hi,

I removed your "skid mark" image from the Tire article. Tread marks don't show up on actual skid marks because the tires are not rotating when a car skids. If you do not believe me, please take a look at images.google.com searching for "skid mark tire" for lots of evidence. This shows a danger of having editors create their own illustrations for articles. If you don't mind, I'm going to nominate this image for deletion, as it is now an orphan and does not illustrate anything in the real world. Comet Tuttle (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skidmarks.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Skidmarks.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Comet Tuttle (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers - thanks for the beer - Comet Tuttle (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turkey and England football rivalry

The article Turkey and England football rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly seems to be a notable rivalry, especially with no Turkish goal scored

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 06:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turkey and England football rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkey and England football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkey and England football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ravendrop 10:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Türkiye Kupasi

No problem :) But i am not sure about the flags. There are no flags at other nations. Too much?

Ok, let's wait. Do you have pics of the Türkiye Kupasi trophies? As far as i know there have been 3 different designs 1886kusagi (talk) 13:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is the 2n one. Awarded between 1999-2004 http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/6708/k017r.jpg Would be nice to have them in the article. Like FA Cup. Same for Süper Lig 1886kusagi (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the cup i've showed was the old Champion trophy. This the cup i've meant. http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/966/zwischenablage01b.jpg 1886kusagi (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you've found an old post of me at wowTurkey.com :) The main problems is the 2nd trophy. The first and curent one can be found at the museums of BJK, FB or GS. But i am not sure about the 2nd one. Only Galatasaray (1999 and 2000) has won it. 2001 Genclerbilrigi, 2002 Kocaeli and TS in 2003 and 2004. As far as i know TS has got a new museum. We need "free" pics from flickt etc. 1886kusagi (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, didn't know it, but in Germany the media says "Türkiye Kupasi". Maybe we should just try it. Maybe nobody from wiki will say something :) 1886kusagi (talk) 08:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Darüşşafaka S.K., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.137 (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2003–04 Turkish Cup

Template:2003–04 Turkish Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Koppapa (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Böyle Uygun

Türkiye Kupası uluslararası kupalara benzememektedir. Bu yüzden bu şablonun böyle kalması uygundur.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bunlar yok edilmedi sadece birleştirildi. Değişiklikleri geri alıcam.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bir karar yok. Kendi inisiyatifimle yaptım.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Değişikliklerimde bir mantıksızlık göremedim. Bence böyle daha iyiydi.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdiğiniz yıldız için teşekkürlerimi sunarım.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group A standings

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group A standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group B standings

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group B standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Umut Kaya

The article Umut Kaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish help needed

Hello Ekin, I'm contacting you because we need some Turkish translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Turkish Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Champions League template

Hi, just a note on Template:UEFA Champions League. As Metalist were in this year's tournament, and then removed, the template should reflect that. Not including them gives the impression they were not in it at all. Thanks. Cg29692 (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:After extra time

Hi. I noticed you reverted my edit on the above template without giving a good reason. I put the dots on there to make it look like an abbreviated word, instead of it looking like a completely different word (don't know whether I've explained myself well enough but I'm sure you get what I'm saying). You will also find that on most articles with scores after extra time the "a.e.t." always has dots/periods to show that it's an abbreviation of "after extra time". Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 19:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Cup

Can you improve Turkish Cup and Turkish Cup seasons and finals, new and old, there are many missing ! See here how many to improve: Template:Turkish Cup Help your country. Thanks !--86.121.111.69 (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UTC

ℚ--188.58.49.60 (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make it last forever

Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill. 84.44.117.8 (talk) 14:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

abi bunun ne olduğunu bilmiyom deneyip bana bi söyler misin savolll sissyneck (talk) 07:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ekin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cengiz Kurtoğlu

The article Cengiz Kurtoğlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see evidence of this artist meeting the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012 FIFA Club World Cup finalists

Template:2012 FIFA Club World Cup finalists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. S.A. Julio (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]