User talk:Ekh0-1

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poki (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Poki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ekh0-1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was not expecting it to be approved, I just wanted to request that it be expanded on, how can I do that?

3kh0 | 3kh0.github.io (talk) 22:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Ekh0-1talk 23:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bbb23!

At first I was a bit confused on why I was blocked but then I found that the reasons you provided was Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia; trolling; possible sock. And I want to explain why I feel that I should be unblocked by replying to each reason you provided.

Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia

I always wanted to help, but I do not think that my response will go well in this section, so I will just put it in the next section

Trolling

You said that I was "trolling" and I will admit, some of my edits were not of good faith. Pretty much on the entire day of April 6th, I was just copying different userboxes that I had liked and made them seem like I had made them. You had also reverted a bunch of other edits, some that I feel were valid, and some that I disagree with. But I will not talk about it. I will just remember to not do those changes.

Possible sock

At first I was very confused on what sock account means, but I did some research and sock account is just a alternate account. I have even listed on my profile, that I do not have any alternate accounts but I guess you still thought that I was sock. I don't know a way I can prove it to you but I can assure you, that this account is not a sock. If you need me to do something to prove that this is my one and only account, I will be happy to follow through!

Final thoughts

With that said, I bet that you are still thinking that I was just trolling the whole time but I am still learning, I was actually doing the introduction to Wikipedia when I got the message of my block. I have learned my lesson and I am really sorry for my actions. I will take a few weeks off from editing and learn more about how to become a constructive member of the community as well as learning how to create better edits and contributions. I still want to contribute to Wikipedia in the future, but if you still feel that I should not do so, I respect your decision. I would love if you could answer some of my questions and I look forward to talking to you.

I still respect the admins of Wikipedia, I feel that the work they do is truly amazing and the never-ending battle that they are in against vandals.

Thank you for the work you do!

Ekh0-1talk 00:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ekh0-1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please read my response, thanks! - Echo

Decline reason:

Socking is not just "alternate account", as there are legitimate uses of alternate accounts; socking is an illegitimate use of an alternate account, for example pretending to be two different people, evading a block, or good hand/bad hand accounts. If you have not used alternate accounts in a bad way, okay. In any event, you seem to indicate that you don't wish to edit at this time, so there is no need to do anything about the block, as blocks only prevent editing. When you do have an edit that you wish to make, you may request unblock at that time, telling us what it is and assure us that future edits will be in good faith. 331dot (talk) 13:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Poki

Hello, Ekh0-1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Poki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poki

Hello, Ekh0-1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]