User talk:Ekarfi13

Here to talk and help about articles .

Great. Then try using the article Talk pages rather than blindly reverting. Jayjg ^(talk) 12:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jews

Please do not add your own original research to articles. We follow what has been written about our subjects in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information you keep adding to the article is at odds with what the article's sources say. Please stop adding your personal opinion to the article without bringing reliable sources that support it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe my messages weren't clear. If you have a point to make, find a reliable source that supports it. The article, as written, is supported by reliable sources, so making changes that go against those sources will be reverted. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Maghrebi Jews. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Maghrebi Jews. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Maghrebi Jews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest you heed Jayjg's warning Nil Einne (talk) 09:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Jews. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Maghreb and Maghreb people, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Logging in

Ekarfi13, despite the fact you've been asked to login while editing, you generally only do so when a page is semi-protected. As a result, your edit history does not reflect what you are actually doing. I've asked you many times to login while editing; why do you not do so? Jayjg ^(talk) 02:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 12:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Maghrebi Jews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Celts, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Indo-Europeans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jews

I understand what Mizrahi Jews are. What I don't understand is why you're deleting content. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]