User talk:Ejwcun

Rusk documents

I've answered your questions on my talk page. I've also reverted your reinsertion of that material, because it violates several guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. Please do not edit war to reinsert the info; instead, if, after reading my info, you still think it belongs in the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned, please don't edit war to include information that violates WP:RS. The burden is going to be on you to demonstrate that those are reliable sources; I'll open discussion tomorrow. Until then, please do not reinsert the material. Qwyrxian (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

For your information: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truesight The Banner _talk 18:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, What is the Sockpuppet ? --Ejwcun (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Please do not remove the comments of others from the noticeboard. You may strike yours or you may post a message indicating your desire to withdraw. Do not alter the posts of othere, or your own so that they misrepresent the discussion. Tiderolls 20:30, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdrawed because feels uncomfortable. Just feel like b=nobody care about me.--Ejwcun (talk) 20:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's regrettable, but your concern should've preceded your AN/I post. Tiderolls 20:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Truesight (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ejwcun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason for unblock provided. Tiderolls 22:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I really sorry for Truesight, Y00tu

They are really not me. But their accounts are blocked because of this.

I'm really sorry for that. This is frankly speech, I really sorry for them.

Unblock request

Replace the "Your reason here" with your reason for requesting unblock. Tiderolls 21:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked. because I against to admin. They dislike me whatever reason. [1] I lost all respect to wikipedia. Even if I appeal unblock, They probably says, "You are guilty whatever" keep block. I feel this from their attitude.

Frankly, Really Frankly, I have no another account. This is all I can says.

I'm really sorry to Truesight, Y00tu . They are really not me. I can swear this. --Ejwcun (talk) 21:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not follow my instructions I will have to decline your request on procedural grounds. Please read WP:GAB. Tiderolls 21:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check user between me and them. IP or country, region, Whatever. The only unblock appeal is "Check user me". Even i was blocked, My last words are they are really innocent. unblock them. --Ejwcun (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To Truesight

Sorry. You are really angry about that. Because you are not me. If anyone can edit rusk documents they claims that account is automatically belong to you and me. This is funny. aren't you ? Really wikipedia sucks.

Y00tu

Sorry about that. You are really angry about that, too. hahaha. They claims that you are me! hahaha! sucks. sorry. I know you are innocent.

--Ejwcun (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

_{Subscript text}== Talk page abuse == You can lose the ability to edit this page if you cause disruption here. Disruption includes frivolous unblock requests or comments that do not relate to your unblock. Now, read WP:GAB and present a valid request or move on. Also, see WP:BLANKING. Confirmed sockpuppet notices cannot be removed from this page. Tiderolls 22:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are really angry about that. All I can says, "I'm not them." How can prove i'm not them?? --Ejwcun (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ejwcun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sock. I'm a new user. You will expain how can prove i'm not sock. I don't know how can prove this. You can Check my IP or whatever. Check me. All I can say is I'm not. because that account are not mine and they are innocent about this. You will expain how can prove i'm not sock.

Decline reason:

I cannot confirm that you are a sock of User:Truesight, because that account hasn't edited since April. However, I can say that it is Confirmed by checkuser that you're using at least three other accounts, all of which are now blocked indefinitely. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One cannot prove what you ask. Tiderolls 22:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request formal check user or something. I can not request check user myself because i am blocked.

If there are any procedure how can prove innocent of sock, I will follow that procedure. WP:GAB don't say anything. I really don't know how can.

And Truesight, Y00tu, two accounts are really innocent about this. --Ejwcun (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was stated on the SPI that checkuser would be useless in this situation. WP:GAB does address this issue: see Wikipedia:GAB#Sockpuppetry_blocks. Tiderolls 22:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The funny thing about sockpuppets is that, about 90% of the time, they'll insist they're not sockpuppets and checking them will prove that. I'm afraid "I'm not a sockpuppet, check me and see" isn't enough to get you unblocked here. You were blocked as a sockpuppet under the grounds that If you do the exact same things as somebody, odds are you're them. So instead of saying "check me for proof I'm not Truesight", you need to explain, yourself, why you're not Truesight. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What? "check me for proof I'm not Truesight", you need to explain, yourself, why you're not Truesight. Explain How ? Are you comedian ?

You sound like a

You : "You are guilty whatever. You stole this"

Me : "What? I am not stole it"

You : "You looks like a Thief. end of story"

Me : I'm really not. Here. There is nothing in my pocket. I'm not.

You : "Every thief says, they are not stole. Whatever, you are guilty"

Me : "WTF" How can prove this ? If you don't believe me. check my bag or wear or whatever. here.

You : You looks like a Thief. That ths evidence. So instead of saying "check me I'm not Thief", you need to explain, yourself, why you're not Thief.

ME : I was not stole it.

You : "Every thief says, they are not stole. Whatever, you are guilty"

ME: WTF

--Ejwcun (talk) 22:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked by them, because Oversight issue. As I said before, I'm a new user. I don't know anything about rule. I don't know how can unblock appeal about Oversight block issue. Too complex to me. Is there any "example" or easily understandable way of unblock request ? If there are any procedure how can prove innocent of sock, I will follow that procedure. --Ejwcun (talk) 22:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't attack others for believing you are based on your actions. If you want to be unblocked, please explain why you are not Truesight.- The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that this has nothing to do with WP:OVERSIGHT. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

how CAN prove this ? Well, I absolutely no interesting figure skaters such as Mao Asada, Kanako Murakami edits like his. I don't know even Report of Van Fleet Mission.

BECAUSE I'M REALLY NOT. AND THEY ARE A INNOCENT ABOUT THIS. THEY and My commons are edited ONLY ONE same page.

please explain why this this has nothing to do with OVERSIGHT.

If there are any procedure how can prove innocent of sock, I will follow that procedure.

No procedure about this issue ?

--Ejwcun (talk) 23:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:OVERSIGHT as that will explain how oversight is utterly unrelated to you. Also immediately running to WP:ANI crying admin abuse is not something a new user does. I'm afraid your arguments remain unconvincing but will leave this to another admin to decide. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then explain to me why you seem to have exactly the same writing tics as Truesight and push an identical POV in the articles you edit. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is truly epic. Because POV is same in ONE ARTICLE, it automatically become a sock ? Ha Ha Ha... Then, Every Japanese are same POV edit on Korea/Japan dipsuted article, Then all Japanese editors are sock of another account, it should be banned ?

This is Truly Epic. EVEN My endligh is skill not good like him. I'm even not intersing figure skaters like their accounts.

OK OK. I'm done with wikipedia.

However, I must say YOU ARE BLOCKED WRONG PERSON. THEY ARE REALLY NOT ME. AND THIS IS REALLY EPIC. you should says sorry for them. OK. I DONE. I QUIT. --Ejwcun (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bye! But remember, we will see everything... The Banner _talk 23:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What? "we will see everything" ? By your words, I realize how absurd your claim is. Because i'm really not. Did you see what ? Pretty much you idiots and can’t tell the difference between a me and them.

Because of your stupid duck test ? Your assumption ? This kind of stupid assumption works for everyone ?

Check wikipedia sever log, Check English skill and habit. Yes, POV is same, BUT they are not me. Every british person think falkland island is their. Every agrentina person thinks Malvinas island is their. If several argentina users edits Malvinas island page on same pov. They are automatically become a sock accounts ? What is Wrong ?

I reverted someone else. I become an another account.

there is no procedure how can prove innocent of sock. This is plain stupid.

Too many fucking power to adminstrator. Everything is possible because their stupid fucking "asssumption".

there is no fucking reason, just "I think you are them!" then suddenly i become a sock. and block. I have no chance to how can prove innocent of sock. OK OK

My Last word is "I'M REALLY NOT THEM". ME and They are really innocent. This is sincere speak. and I swear to god. I REALLY HATE THIS PLACE. I WILL NEVER VISIT HERE. BYE. Pretty much you idiots can’t distinguish between a me and them. I laughed. This idiot say "we will see everything" ? What ? How stupid idiot this is. because i'm not. This idiot believe he can see eveything. really fucking funny. because of you, I realize how absurd wikipedia checking system is. --Ejwcun (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access removed

To prevent your causing more disruption on this page I have blocked your ability to edit this page. Tiderolls 00:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]