User talk:Ejlauren121/sandbox

The article does not particularly relate to the Trump Administration. Perhaps mention the Trump's administration's plan to abolish the EPA and the possible effects of this? Some parts of the article could be summarized further like the Overview/Introduction. Teresayu1 (talk) 02:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Overall, you have a lot of really good information and sources. You might consider using headers and sub-header for easier navigation and organization. I also didn't see much mention of environmental justice aspects of electronic waste, you may want to consider expanding this and also adding information about Trump's administration as it relates to e-waste. Great job so far! Mcnelson510 (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   - Thank you for your review Mcnelson510. We will definitely look to incorporate more info/maybe a new section on Trumps Administration and definitely will flesh out the Ej parts. CarlesPuyol5 (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)CarlesPuyol5[reply]

This article is great so far! I really love your in depth conversation of E-waste and how it relates to environmentalism. I think your article is could improve on the discussion of how this topic is timely and relevant to environmental justice and the Trump Admin. I think you have a great start so far! Great work! EmilyDenny (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very informative and very well written! You are using sources very efficiently and correctly and I think that the sections you have right now cover a lot of the topics that need to be known when it come to electronic waste. However, it may be possible that people would argue that your article has some bias to it. IT might be smart to add a alternatives sections, or include contrasting views or instances to the sections that you already have. I think this would make the wiki page more neutral probably less likely to receive criticism! Also you should include more facts about the environmental justice aspects. Mleeson (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback - Garshaw

Nice page! I would begin to get it into Wiki format (proper heading formats, table of contents, etc...) as you will be going live soon. Great content, good supporting citations. Try "writing for the enemy" a little bit to balance your article (if possible). Since this is an addition, make sure it fits into the broader article in a logical way and your outline is consistent with the broader article's. GAA8423 (talk) 05:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]