User talk:Ejgreen77/Archives/2016/January

Your recent edits

Thank you for your recent addition of a results table to the Columbia–Cornell rivalry. Looking at your userpage, I share your love of things German; and as I try to research early southern football players most of all, and see your connection with Canisius College, I should mention Gene Oberst was quite the athlete (6 feet 5 inches in 1920 might as well be Shaquille O'Neal today). Cake (talk) 14:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Arizona Wildcats football series records and three others for deletion

Ejgreen77, because of the interest you expressed in a closely related topic during the discussion @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Longhorns football series records, I am notifying you that a new discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted:

1. Arizona Wildcats football series records;
2. Charlotte 49ers football series records;
3. Texas A&M Aggies football series records; and
4. UMass Minutemen football series records.

These articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona Wildcats football series records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Team-level honors for NFL and CFB players

I saw that you pinged me about NFL team awards, EJ: [1]. Yes, there has been a wild proliferation of navboxes for minor team-level awards and honors since I started editing in mid-2009, most of which contribute to bottom-of-the-page cruft and clutter without any substantial benefit to our readers in terms of useful navigation. As your comments suggested, it's past time to selectively purge these marginal team-level award navboxes. While there may a handful of team-level awards that merit a navbox, most do not, and you should feel free to take the initiative in nominating them for discussion at TfD. If you want a second opinion about any given team-level award, I would suggest you ping Jweiss11, Cbl62, Yankees10 and myself. I think the four of us are a representative spectrum of opinion on whether to keep or purge. You will being the NFL and CFB projects a service by leading here. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Iowa Hawkeyes football series records and three others for deletion

EJ, because of the interest you expressed in a closely related topic during the discussion @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Longhorns football series records, I am notifying you that a new discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted:

1. Iowa Hawkeyes football series records;
2. Alabama Crimson Tide football series records;
3. Michigan Wolverines football series records; and
4. Michigan State Spartans football series records.

These articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iowa Hawkeyes football series records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 10:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Monaco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Monaco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Monaco (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)