User talk:Ejgreen77/Archives/2016/December

Precious

project work

Thank you for quality articles on people, beginning with Katie Macfarlane, also Nancy Cox and Teresa Cheatham, for navboxes and countless project tags (evaluating article quality and importance) for too many projects to list here, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda! I very much appreciate it. Ejgreen77 (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canisius Golden Griffins baseball coach navbox

Template:Canisius Golden Griffins baseball coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Confusing WikiProject tagging

I see that you tagged the redirect low energy under WikiProject Donald Trump. You might be interested in commenting at the redirect's thread at redirects for discussion. Cheers. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Molly Bouchard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly Bouchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Bouchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Piper Stoeckel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piper Stoeckel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piper Stoeckel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jennifer Hepner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Hepner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Hepner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)