Jump to content

User talk:Ejackson345/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review for Dendrology

[edit]

The article does a good job of being brief, non-biased, and to the point. It is very thorough throughout the entry article. In the solutions the pest and diseases section, it wouldn’t be bad to go into more detail about the chemical applications. Also, in the bark section, going into the coloration of the bark would be interesting as well. Add to the bark section and the solutions section and add some description about the ICUN red list focusing on the tree's threats for the future. I really enjoyed the way they broke everything down further. It looked cleaner and easy to read so that I may apply that to my article. They were 44 words under, but I think by adding to and adding that one section, they will be over the 1200 words quickly. John-Robert Boyd (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]