User talk:Eirik.lingas

Tota

Your editing

Hello.
Can you please take a moment and review your edits, and note that most of them had to have been undone, since they failed to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies? For example, the file you uploaded, File:Det året det var så bratt.ogg, was a full, non-free song in mp3 format without a fair use rationale, which is unacceptable for a number of reasons, and the file had to be deleted. This change hid the content of ABA by redirecting, which would have lost Wikipedia useful information, and had to be undone. This change had to be undone because the song is not a single. This move and the subsequent redirect of the topic was undone both because it didn't follow naming conventions for disambiguation pages, and because it was an undiscussed and controversial move. These edits had to be undone both because of sever WP:BLP concerns, and because there is an explicit consensus on the talk page for the redirect. There was no reason to prevent table of contents or the section edit links on the Larry Williams article, and you provided no reason in the edit summary, as you never do, so it was reverted. And so on and so on.
Being bold is acceptable and desirable if it improves Wikipedia. Making mistakes is absolutely OK, in particular if you are new. But every editor is expected to learn from their mistakes, and if your edits are continuously undone and have to be cleaned up, you should reflect for a moment about why this is so, and maybe try and tread a little more lightly in the future. If you think something might be controversial, discuss it on the talk page first. Always explain your changes in the edit summary. And if you have questions, ask!
Kind regards, Amalthea 19:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)