User talk:Eileenabc

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Herbal Magic. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Herbal Magic. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 19:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Herbal Magic. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. However, continual reverting and restoring text without an explanation or discussion will result in longer blocks. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Stifle (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eileenabc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

Decline reason:

{The only exception to the policy on edit warring is reversion of blatant vandalism. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Canada's national TV broadcaster, the CBC, aired a segment by highly regarded TV journalists, and through the use of hidden cameras, exposed fraudulent practises of the company. My edits provided the reader with a link to the actual TV program. The company keeps removing any references to the TV program as they do not want the public to see it. The fact it aired nationally, and was done by Canada's national TV network was an objective fact. The reader should be entitled to see the link to this program and make their own evaluation about whether or not their practises were fraudulent. People's health may be in danger if they are not aware of these fraudulent practises. The company should not be allowed to continually remove all references to this program. This site should not be a site that only the company controls and that only sites articles making postive comments about this company. I kept posting it because they kept removing it. Thank you for your consideration.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Edit warring. The people removing the text are not exclusively Herbal Magic staff; Wikipedia has a large number of polices such as WP:V and WP:NOR about matters like this. If you keep posting this link when you are unblocked, the next block will be indefinite.. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Stifle (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]