User talk:Ehsonsaeed

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page India versus Pakistan cricket rivalry with this edit do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to James Anderson (cricketer) with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Yasir Hameed with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to McLaren MP4-12C. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ehsonsaeed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that for what reason I have been blocked for editing on Wikipedia, I assure you that in future there will be not such activity like spamming from my account or IP address range. I will only make productive contribution on Wikipedia.

Accept reason:

Blocking admin accepted, though see note at bottom. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since almost all of your recent activity has related to adding spam links, please try to give us an indication of what productive work you'd like to do on Wikipedia if unblocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see I also worked/created an article too named, Saeeda Imtiaz, Obviously I wanna work more productive like this in near future, It was only starting for me, please give me more chance, You always have an authority to block me and I know that, I won't add spam/advertise in future, I understood it completely now, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehsonsaeed (talk • contribs)

I'm inclined to give you a second chance, but I'm relatively new at this, so I've asked for the blocking admin's opinion. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks a lot for your cooperation. I am waiting for further actions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehsonsaeed (talk • contribs)

I am inclined to accept this unblock request, but I will defer to Qwyrxian in his dialogue with HJ Mitchell. If an unblock is granted, I would emphasise that editing disruptively or non-constructively in future would result in an immediate re-block. Regards, AGK [•] 22:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, my humblest apologies for not following up on this. I really should have proceeded much more aggressively on this. HJ Mitchell indicated still being worried, but that you could be unblocked and then watched closely. So, I am going to unblock you. Please understand that if you resume spamming, you will be reblocked indefinitely, and it is highly unlikely that any unblock requests at that point will be accepted. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]