User talk:Egthegreat
Welcome!
Hello, Egthegreat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 03:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Elizabeth Woodville
[edit]Hi, thanks for your edits to the article. I don't have any problem with most of your edits, but I've changed the spellings back to UK spelling from US spelling as the article is about British history, per WP:ENGVAR. Paul B (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Egthegreat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Cynthia Bailey Lee
[edit]Hi, I noticed your edits to Cynthia Bailey Lee, specifically, that you removed mention of her religion. Why did you remove it? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
-- Hi, Rachel, this update reflects a more recent change and was discussed with the subject. Egthegreat (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'll go ahead and remove the Mormon feminists category then. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Cynthia Bailey Lee redux
[edit]Beg pardon, but regarding this edit: I'm not quite sure I see how the edit in question relates to the edit summary? Sorry to be obtuse, but I want to make sure of what I'm missing. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- the point of the article was that she called it "ladysplaining" to the original memo author's "mansplaining" about women in tech. It doesn't seem out of place to reference it. Egthegreat (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I don't see how that relates to the category Category:21st-century American women, which you removed. That's what's confusing me. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- That is because I am a dork... please revert. Egthegreat (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Quite alright - who among us has not been once in a while? :-) I believe it's been reverted.
- Please forgive my belaboring the point, but I honestly didn't want to put a step wrong and wasn't sure if I had missed something of which I should have been aware. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- That is because I am a dork... please revert. Egthegreat (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I don't see how that relates to the category Category:21st-century American women, which you removed. That's what's confusing me. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)