User talk:Egocentric

Please do not add nonsense articles such as "profitseeker" which i have now deleted. Martin 14:31, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Perhaps an article like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24SevenOffice also should be deleted? See discussion under: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Help_desk

"Where does this stuff come from?"

That is an encyclopedic article about a small company, yours was a stupid attempt to make money. Martin 15:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I got my point tested, and the message is clear; any user can add an article about a company (big or 'small'?) ! into Wikipedia and it's not violating any rules! So if I add an article, about my own company or the company I work in, it's ok? Egocentric 15:12, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I won't violate any rules, and I'll state my points in a more acceptable fashion! Egocentric 15:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a question of big or small, but how notable a company (or person or whatever) is, small is obviously less likely to be notable. Martin 15:37, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just to get it straight: what category does 24SevenOffice belong to and how is the line drawn? Egocentric 15:45, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I read through Wikipedia_talk:Notability and found notable to be a rather ambiguous guideline. What's the secret. I have a few article ideas about companies. Egocentric 19:21, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]