User talk:Egmontaz

Hello! Welcome to my talk page!

Please feel free to to leave me a message, whether it's informing me of something I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't WP:BITE!

I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:

First and above all, be civil.
- If you don't agree with an action I made—be it reverted you and left a warning, marked your page for deletion, or anything else—please be calm and polite. I am a reasonable man, and we'll straighten it out a lot quicker without screaming and name calling.
Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~)
Please start new conversations at the bottom.
I generally like to keep conversations together.
- If you post here, I'll reply here and leave you a message informing you of my reply.
- If I leave you a message on your talk page, I'll keep watching it, but if you want to make sure I notice it quickly, leave me a {{talkback}} template (although not necessary).
  - I'll admit, I don't always keep conversations together, although I try to. If we separate the messages, no big deal, I'll probably go back and cross post here.

Since that is out of the way, please click here and leave a message!

copied from User:Apparition11's talk page

Archives

Quellcrist Falconer

not entirely sure why you reverted my edits, seeing as I'm copying directly from the book, and I left a perfectly clear edit summary. Perhaps you should read the book that you are editing the page of. 70.79.195.123 (talk) 07:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not either sure, reviewing what I reverted I can't see why I did so. So I probably done a mistake. Accept my apologies. I undid my reversion. Regards --Egmontaz♤ ^talk 07:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thank you for responding so quickly70.79.195.123 (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

Hello. I am wondering if you can answer a quick question: When reverting vandalism, and there were two consecutive vandal edits by different editors, does it sometimes occur that the last edit is reverted burying the previous bad contrib? Do you see what I mean? I am new to Huggle and wonder if there is something I can do to safeguard against this. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I get your point, I am also relatively new. As far as I know there aren't any such saveguards other than the operators instict. I wonder what would be the optimized strategy, spending time to search for "deep vandalism" or reverting what you see rapidly and leave the rest to the people who have the article at theirs watchlist. I personally prefer the second option helping in obvious cases and leaving the rest, with some exceptions (having english as a second language, this suits me better). Both are helpful I think, of course the second is much bot-like but it is also needed when recent changes are at >100 edits per minute. Regards! --Egmontaz♤ ^talk 13:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Thank you for the reply. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!!! Thanks for the Wikipedia update! I like the new features and it works in Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome perfectly! It really helps! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.165.226.147 (talk) 13:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seorsumuscardinus

Hi, thanks for your review and support on Seorsumuscardinus. As the FAC has already been closed, I'm responding to your comments here. I added a key to the tooth abbreviations at the bottom of the table. As for Karydia, it's probably best to create a dab page at Karydia. Ucucha 15:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You are probable right about Karydia, looking forward to read your new FAC. --Egmontaz♤ ^talk

I started the dab page and will fix some links. Ucucha 21:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Needs You!

Hi there, Egmontaz! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottoes. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottoes there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 06:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

via AWB

Changes to 'Roman Deities'

I did not make any changes to the page about Roman Deities and none of my contributions to Wikipedia have ever been "experiments" or "playing." I have more than one degree in more than one subject. I also do not have a shared IP address, so do not understand why I received this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.121.237.3 (talk) 05:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]