User talk:Eggdipie3

This is Eggdipie3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Eggdipie3, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: The "WE" Tour (2022) (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The "WE" Tour (2022) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eggdipie3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: We Tour (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:We Tour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, Eggdipie3, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Eggdipie5 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eggdipie3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I regret my actions involving Genesis and Yes albums. Because of my actions, my main account (Eggdipie3), which has existed for three years, has been blocked. All I plan to do with this account after today is update tour information on Yes and The Musical Box. I will not create pages and if my edits get deleted, they will stay deleted. I plan on following the Wikipedia guidelines after I get unblocked and do plan to use this account for good. I sincerely apologize to those who wasted their time reversing my edits. - Egg

Decline reason:

No chance at the moment. You worked hard to demonstrate you cannot be trusted. WP:SO is almost certainly your only option at this point. That requires six months with zero edits, then you'll need to address your inappropriate edits, your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, and your attempts to mislead us. Yamla (talk) 23:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note this user is now considered banned by the community under WP:3X due to repeated violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eggdipie3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'd like to make a third (I deleted the second to make an updated one) unban request regarding my ban in October of 2022. In September and October, I used alt accounts to ban evade and spread false information onto Wikipedia (which I do not remember the details of as I don't have the best memory). I sincerely apologize for the ban evading, as I did it so many times that all of my gmails, hotmails, and yahoo accounts were blocked on Wikipedia. If I am unbanned, I promise to only spread correct information, which I have pre-prepared for the date I was supposed to be unbanned, April 14th, including edits to add an article on Electric Sun, the new VNV Nation album, and several Genesis songs. It has been the alloted amount of time mentioned in making an unban request, six months, and I do sincerely plan to change for the better. - Egg

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion slightly less than six months ago as TheMachineMessiah, where the user attempted to mislead us. Note also this user is considered banned by the community under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 13:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you are considered to be community banned, no administrator may unilaterally lift the block. There must be a community discussion about your request. I'm not certain that it is likely to succeed at this time, but if you wish to proceed, is this the statement you want transferred to WP:AN? 331dot (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, as I am very much willing to peacefully rejoin the community and add some much needed and delayed changes (regarding Yes or Genesis) to the wide open project that is Wikipedia. Eggdipie3 (talk) 23:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at it more closely, your statement doesn't really go into detail about your actions, nor does it describe the other accounts you have used. Those are both prerequisites for any discussion about your ban. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eggdipie3, you were continuing to sock even today. You need to stop and restart the six month clock all over again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]