User talk:Egeyam

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line 2 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line 2 was changed by Egeyam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951168 on 2015-01-24T19:36:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Your recent editing history at Victory Party (Turkey) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 14:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block from Victory Party (Turkey)

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Note that you still have access to editing the article talk page (which for some reason you stopped using for the last few weeks while still edit warring) for the duration of this block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 01:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]