User talk:Efreeti

Greetings. I agree with your removal of the unsourced organ harvesting rumour from Falungong. My last reversion wasn't in response to your edits. --Fire Star 04:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Rhobite 19:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation of Mediation of Netflix links section

I've put myself forward to mediate this dispute, and I request your acceptance of this under my comment on the mediation page linked above. Once I have consent from everyone to my work, I can begin. Thanks. --Xyra e l ^T 16:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have given up on the Netflix link issue. As I browse more and more wikipedia webpages, I find that many trivial and unimportant links are often inserted into pages along with the important ones. This practice appears to be the norm and not the exception. I have come to terms that wikipedia is a free white board with great pop culture content, rather than a formal encyclopedia text.--Efreeti 17:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]