Jump to content

User talk:Efmcleanckm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Getting started
Make a short userpage! Everyone's wary of a redlink. Edit your preferences to verify your email and set up email alerts, say for when someone leaves you new talkpage messages.
Helpful links
Editing || Writing a great article || Naming and Merging || Style Manual
Policies || What Wikipedia is not
Maintenance
Deleting articles || all maintenance tasks (see also open tasks, below)

Uploading images: please note the origins and copyright status of every image you upload. 

To sign your comments, type four tildes like this:  ~~~~. 
This automatically adds your name and the current time.

I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian on en:. You can also leave questions on my talk page. :)

Regards, +sj+


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

WikiProject for Librarians

[edit]

Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Libraries -- sign up, and monitor their talk page. That's a good place to leave questions or comments about what you're doing. –SJ+ 16:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other related projects:

Thank you sj! I have been using the WP:GLAM along with work that the British Museum (Liam Wyatt) has been doing in this area. Efmcleanckm (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Setting citation style for museums and archives

[edit]

The Library WikiProject may be interested in the above; so will the GLAM wikiproject:

ok as of 10/8/2010- here is where we are with our citation style for external links pertaining to WDL / Partners:

Efmcleanckm (talk) 13:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Be careful with right-to-left text when pasting in a line -- doublecheck that it comes out the way you intend.

Explain that you are linking to full online versions of the source material. That's not normally what people link to, and it's a wonderful part of the WDL. If you're going to include mention when there is an audio recording of a page's text, do it for all materials -- and clarify that audio of a curator's notes, not audio of the piece itself.

It would be appropriate to add an extra half-sentence about each piece to clarify exactly what it is -- say "Full pdf of the original manuscript and curator's audio comments."

When adding general further reading or primary source material rather than a cite for a specific fact, you don't need to include a "Retrieved on" clause. If you were citing a specific datum from a curator's comments, then a "Retrieved on" would be appropriate. –SJ+ 21:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOC Context

[edit]

For topics such as Naxi scripts, where the LOC has an entire collection, it helps to provide some context for a specific WDL entry. For instance, there is already an external link to a page describing the LOC scripts collection (which doesn't link to the gorgeous WDL piece!). If you can put those two refs into context, it will help readers find what they want right away, and make better use of the WDL work. –SJ+ 21:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply; leaving me a note in my talk page is appropriate! –SJ+ 19:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gregorian calendar

[edit]

I wanted to let you know I reverted your EL addition at Gregorian calendar only because the document to which you linked is in Spanish; being a non-English text, it can't be expected to be a lot of use to readers of the English wikipedia; it would be fine to add on the Spanish wikipedia, though. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 23:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Format

[edit]

Hello again! Yes, you should add this to the GLAM wikiproject talk. Cheers, –SJ+ 01:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

* World Digital Library presentation of original language title or translation of title.  
Partner Institution.  Primary source {item type} with summary description, {#} images with enhanced 
view and zoom features, text to speech capability {with curator video}.  {Language(s) of the source}.  
Links to related content.   Content available as {file format).  {Brief statement of notability.}


Helping to build the encyclopedia

[edit]

Dear Efm,

If you would only take another minute to add context when adding a link, your contributions would be vastly more helpful and illustrative.

For instance, your link on the Gregorian calendar page:

  1. Explain the relevance and notability of the link.
    "A four-page edict issued by King Phillip II of Spain in 1584, decreeing the change from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar. Produced by Italian typographer Antonio Ricardo, who helped the Jesuits in Lima establish the first printing office in South America."
  2. If the connection is not clear from the text of the article, add a sentence about it in the article under the relevant section, along with a footnote.
    "King Phillip II of Spain decreed a change to the Gregorian calendar in 1584.[1]"

A footnote in context is more useful than a raw external link, and with it you are adding more meaningfully to the encyclopedia. Making wikilinks out of proper names and significant concepts likewise helps people find this article when browsing related topics.

In most cases, the linked LOC page already has good text introducing the link, so you don't need to do a lot of new writing yourself.

Regards, –SJ+ 02:14, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:Advice for the cultural sector's talk page.

[edit]

I would just like to point out that your edits of this nature are being reverted because peole think there adds...I have fixed a few to removed the personal and instructive dialogue. This would not be appropriate as per Wikipedia:External links. So i will help fix them were i can before there deleted because they are useful. Hope we did not loose to many to people who did not see the value of the link and just saw the wording. Moxy (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work since October~ It looks like your recent work has all been received well. Congrats on working out the initial kinks. Have you gathered data on the Library's end regarding how many people have viewed the original articles? Have you received any direct comments on the inclusion of these works in Wikipedia? Regards, –SJ+ 07:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Efmcleanckm&oldid=1139059532"