Jump to content

User talk:Effervescency

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Effervescency, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Effervescency! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Effervescency, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 14:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Potential superpower sources

[edit]

Effervescency one editor removed a lot of material on the potential superpowers saying inappropriate material which they specially removed material but allowed other material on other potential superpower countries to stick that on another country. I think it is inappropriate for editors to remove material on one country and leave in on another as if it is there own. Referring to comments made by politicians, diplomats, scholarly publications, presidents regarding such as Russia as a superpower are appropriate and valid facts for support for countries on potential superpowers, not just one country but all countries, need your input, thanks.--198.134.105.98 (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]